Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep II DoR 54/2010 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2010:II.DOR.54.2010 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request due to failure to meet statutory conditions under ZPP Article 367a.

Numero d'incarto Sklep II DoR 54/2010
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to appeal, ruling that the statutory conditions under Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure were not met. The applicant mixed grounds for appeal with procedural violations and failed to demonstrate a significant legal error, while the lower courts correctly found the property belonged to the current partner based on payment sources and lack of shared residence. Consequently, the court dismissed the request as it did not satisfy the threshold for appellate review.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 367c paragraph 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure: Permission to appeal is denied when the applicant fails to substantiate the statutory conditions for granting such permission.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Code of Civil Procedure permission to appeal statutory conditions appellate review procedural requirements lower court decision legal error threshold motivi di revisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 367c paragraph 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Generato dall'IA
Sodba II Ips 956/2006
Appeal dismissed; claim for purchase right and relocation allowance rejected due to missed statutory deadlines and owner's consent.
Sodba II Ips 236/2008
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in co-ownership dispute, upholding equal shares in extramarital community property.
Sklep X Ips 195/2013
Supreme Court dismisses appeal as legal issues are not significant and severe consequences were not proven.
VSL sklep I Cp 3167/2009
Appeal granted; preliminary injunction against publishing controversial allegations about a public figure is revoked.
VSRS Sodba II Ips 261/2018
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on non-contractual damages, ruling statute of limitations starts when damage occurs, not contract voidness.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

V tej zadevi niso podani pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Predlog za dopustitev revizije se zavrne.

OBRAZLOŽITEV:

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek za ugotovitev, da sporno stanovanje spada v skupno premoženje tožnika in prve toženke z enakim deležem ter za izstavitev zemljiškoknjižne listine. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo tožnikovo pritožbo in potrdilo prvostopenjsko sodbo. Odločitev sodišč temelji na dejanskih ugotovitvah, da je bilo stanovanje kupljeno v času, ko tožnik in prva toženka nista več živela v življenjski in ekonomski skupnosti, kupnina pa je bila plačana z denarjem sedanjega partnerja prve toženke.

2. Tožnik v pravočasnem predlogu za dopustitev revizije prepleta revizijske razloge in razloge za dopustitev revizije, zatrjuje tudi procesne kršitve, meni, da je praksa delovnega in socialnega sodišča pri dopuščanju revizije neenotna in nato še dobesedno prepiše štiri strani svoje pritožbe.

3. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da v tej zadevi niso podani pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP). Zato je na podlagi drugega odstavka 367.c člena ZPP zavrnilo tožnikov predlog.