Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep II DoR 160/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2010:II.DOR.160.2009 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding the amount of non-material damages awarded in a tort case.

Numero d'incarto Sklep II DoR 160/2009
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia granted the leave for appeal regarding the specific amount of non-material damages awarded. The first-instance court rejected the plaintiff's higher claim, while the second-instance court partially increased the awarded sum to 7,317.96 EUR. The court found the appeal admissible because the lower court's valuation of non-material damages deviated from established Supreme Court practice.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure; Article 367b of the Act on Civil Procedure: An appeal is admissible when the lower court's assessment of non-material damages significantly deviates from established Supreme Court case law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
non-material damages civil procedure appeal admissibility Supreme Court practice tort liability monetary compensation deviation from precedent diritto a una copertura assicurativa più estesa

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure
Article 367b of the Act on Civil Procedure

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
II Ips 41/2006
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on non-property damage compensation for burns, upholding lower court's valuation based on individualized assessment principles.
Generato dall'IA
VSL sodba II Cp 1606/2010
Appeal dismissed; court upheld defamation damages for accusing a victim of theft based on race and timing.
Sodba II Ips 373/2004
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on appeal against civil damages for personal injury based on individualization and objective conditions principles.
VSRS Sodba VIII Ips 161/2018
Supreme Court partially allows appeal, reducing damages and adjusting cost allocation based on employee's negligence percentage.
Sodba II Ips 581/98
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on tort damages, upholding lower courts' assessment of non-material injury compensation.
VSL sodba I Cp 651/99
Appeal dismissed; first instance court correctly applied tort law and procedural rules regarding damages and costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Vrhovno sodišče je revizijo dopustilo glede vprašanja višine denarne odškodnine za nepremoženjsko škodo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Revizija se dopusti glede višine nepremoženjske škode.

OBRAZLOŽITEV:

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je toženi stranki naložilo, da mora tožeči stranki plačati 6.967,96 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 6.860 EUR od 2. 10. 2002 in od 107.096 EUR od 19. 11. 2002 ter mu povrniti pravdne stroške. Višji tožbeni zahtevek je zavrnilo.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je delno ugodilo pritožbi tožeče stranke in sodbo v zavrnilnem delu spremenilo tako, da je toženi stranki naložilo, da mora tožeči stranki plačati 7.317,96 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 6.860 EUR od 2. 10. 2002 od 350 EUR od 19. 11. 2002 in od 107,96 EUR od 19. 11. 2002 ter ji povrniti pravdne stroške. Višji tožbeni zahtevek je zavrnilo.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje je tožeča stranka na podlagi 367. b člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije. Meni, da višina denarne odškodnine za nepremoženjsko škodo, ki ji jo je v konkretnem primeru prisodilo sodišče, odstopa od sodne prakse Vrhovnega sodišča Republike Slovenije, pri čemer se sklicuje na zadevo II Ips 41/2006.

4. Predlog je utemeljen.

5. Ker so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367. a člena ZPP, je Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije revizijo dopustilo glede vprašanja višine denarne odškodnine za nepremoženjsko škodo.