Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V KZ 25/22 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal against refusal to restore deadline for submitting written judgment request.

Numero d'incarto V KZ 25/22
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision to reject the defendant's request to restore the deadline for submitting a written request for the judgment's drafting and service. The defendant argued that the original deadline had expired due to procedural delays, while the opposing party contended that the time limit was strictly observed. The court ruled that the statutory provisions governing procedural deadlines do not permit restoration in this specific circumstance, thereby maintaining the finality of the original ruling.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 239 ust. 1 k.p.k.; Art. 240 ust. 1 k.p.k.: The court established that a request to restore an expired procedural deadline for submitting a written request for judgment drafting is inadmissible when the statutory time limits were strictly observed and no force majeure or other statutory grounds for extension exist.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedural deadline restoration written judgment request criminal procedure code time limit expiration supreme court ruling defendant appeal service of judgment

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 239 ust. 1 k.p.k.
Art. 240 ust. 1 k.p.k.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V KZ 25/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 14 lipca 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Dariusz Świecki w sprawie R. Ł.po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Karnej na posiedzeniu w dniu 14 lipca 2022 r., zażalenia skazanego na postanowienie Sądu Okręgowego w B.z dnia 8 kwietnia 2022 r., sygn. akt IV Ka […], w przedmiocie odmowy przywrócenia skazanemu terminu do złożenia wniosku o sporządzenie na piśmie i doręczenie uzasadnienia wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w B.z dnia 4 lutego 2022 r., sygn. akt IV Ka […], postanowił: utrzymać w mocy zaskarżone postanowienie.