Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II PZ 17/06 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal for failure to specify scope of challenge and misidentify defendant under Civil Procedure Code.

Numero d'incarto II PZ 17/06
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal against a labor court decision regarding disciplinary penalties and compensation. The lower court rejected the appeal because the cassation petition failed to specify the scope of the challenged ruling and incorrectly identified the defendant as the municipality rather than the mayor. The Supreme Court upheld this dismissal, ruling that the formal defects under the Civil Procedure Code precluded the appeal without allowing for formal supplementation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 3984 § 1 pkt 1, 4 k.p.c.; Art. 3986 § 2 k.p.c.: A cassation appeal is inadmissible if it fails to specify the scope of the challenged ruling or misidentifies the defendant, resulting in automatic rejection without opportunity for formal correction.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation appeal scope of challenge misidentification of defendant Civil Procedure Code inadmissible appeal formal defects labor dispute

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
art. 3984 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
art. 3984 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c.
art. 3986 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 3982 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 39814 k.p.c.
art. 3984 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 3984 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c
art. 3986 § 2 k.p.c
art.3982 § 1 k.p.c

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
postanowienie z 9 listopada 2000 r., II CKN 1385/00
postanowienie z 22 marca 2001 r., V CZ 131/01
postanowienie z 12 grudnia 2000 r., V CKN 1780/00
postanowienie z 10 maja 2001 r., II CZ 35/01
postanowienie z 11 maja 2001 r., III CZ 28/01
postanowienie z 30 maja 2001 r., III CZ 36/01
postanowienie z 5 czerwca 2001 r., IV CZ 45/01
postanowienie z dnia 17 października 2001 r., III CZ 98/01
postanowienie z dnia 27 listopada 2001 r., III CKN 462/01

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo