Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
Sentenza — n. 10975/2023 — snpen Generato dall'IA

Criminal appeal dismissed for assault; court rejects self-defense and excessive act claims due to lack of necessity and proportionality.

Numero d'incarto Sentenza — n. 10975/2023 — snpen
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Italia (IT)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible, upholding the lower court's conviction for intentional injury and assault. The defendant argued for self-defense and excessive act, but the court found the danger had ceased and the reaction was disproportionate to the minor provocation. Consequently, the court ruled that no legal justification existed and the defendant must bear full criminal responsibility.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 55, Art. 58, Art. 82 cod. pen.; Self-defense requires actual danger, necessity, and proportionality; absence of these elements precludes excessive act claims and mandates full liability for intentional injury.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
self-defense requirements excessive act defense intentional injury crime provocation mitigation proportionality principle aberratio ictus doctrine criminal appeal inadmissibility lesione corporale da infortunio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 55 cod. pen.
Art. 58 cod. pen.
Art. 82 cod. pen.
Art. 133 cod. pen.
art. 82 cod. pen
art. 55 cod. pen
art. 83 cod. pen
art. 133 cod. pen

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
Sez. 5, n. 19065 del 12/12/2019
Sez. 1, n. 38303 del 23/09/2005
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo