Italian Court dismisses extortion appeal as inadmissible due to reiteration of prior appellate arguments.

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because the appellant re-argued issues already exhaustively decided by the Court of Appeal. The appellant claimed lack of notification and insufficient evidence of money transfers and threats, but the court found the notice was properly served and the facts were corroborated by witness testimony and physical evidence. Consequently, the court ruled that re-litigating settled points violates procedural rules, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal and an order to pay court costs.