Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 638/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:638A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of motivation and incongruence in the appealed judgment.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 638/1988
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by RENFE trainees against a Supreme Court ruling that annulled a labor court dismissal decision. The applicants argued this violated their right to effective judicial protection under Article 24 of the Constitution, citing the Supreme Court's failure to adequately motivate its judgment and the lack of congruence between the grounds and the outcome. The Court rejected the appeal because the contested sentence suffered from defects in motivation and incongruence that rendered it procedurally flawed.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must declare an appeal inadmissible when the contested judgment lacks sufficient motivation or fails to maintain congruence between its reasoning and the final decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
effective judicial protection lack of motivation incongruence of judgment Article 24 Constitution labor dismissal appeal

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24 C.E.
Invocan la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1792-1987

Fecha de resolución

23/05/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.792/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Defectos de la demanda: subsanación. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la Sentencia; congruencia de la Sentencia recurrida. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Los trabajadores de RENFE (voluntarios en prácticas) interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Sexta del Tribunal Supremo que estima recurso de casación y anula la dictada por la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 15 de Madrid, en autos sobre

reclamación por despido. Invocan la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00638-1987_01792.pdf