Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BS-1410/2006-OLR ECLI:DK:OLR:2022:BS0000000326 Generato dall'IA

Court dismisses appeal to reopen child custody case due to lack of new evidence and procedural bar.

Numero d'incarto BS-1410/2006-OLR
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Danimarca (DK)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court dismissed the appellant's request to reopen the child custody proceedings from 2006. The appellant argued that new circumstances regarding the child's well-being had arisen since the original judgment, while the respondent maintained the finality of the decision. The court ruled that no new facts justified reopening the case under the relevant procedural rules.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Sektion 600 af Forældremyndighedsloven; Sektion 601 af Forældremyndighedsloven: A final custody judgment cannot be reopened unless new facts or circumstances arise that were not available at the time of the original decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
child custody appeal reopening proceedings finality of judgment new evidence requirement family law procedure riapertura della pratica riconsiderazione perizia medica superata

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Sektion 600 af Forældremyndighedsloven
Sektion 601 af Forældremyndighedsloven
Generato dall'IA
BS-331/2009-SON
Court dismisses father's appeal as Child Custody Act conditions for reopening the case were not met.
BS-1336/2011-VLR
Court allows appeal against Process Permission Board's refusal of free process due to new income data.
BS-1092/2010-OLR
Appeal against dismissal for missing phone meeting without legal cause; court finds no valid reason for dismissal.
BS-653/2020-OLR
Appeal court dismisses request to reopen case due to lack of legal basis for correcting procedural error.
BS-3507/2014-OLR
Land court allows claim by lifting old statute of limitations decision due to timely interruption request.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sag om, hvorvidt sagsbehandlingen af den respektive sag kan tages op igen

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (10 sider) Part 1 (Sagsøger)

Part 2 (Sagsøger)

Part 1

Part 2

Part 1 Part 2 Part 2

Person 1

Person 1

Barn 1 Dato 1

Barn 1 Person 2

Barn 1 Barn 1

Dato 1 Part 2

Part 2

Skole 1 Skole 2

Part 1

Barn 1 Dato 1

Part 1

Part 1

Part 1 Part 1 Part 2

Barn 1 Barn 1

Part 1

Barn 1 Person 2 Person 2 Part 2´s

Part 1

Part 2´s

Part 1 Part 2 Part 1 Part 2