Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BS-1165/2010-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2023:BS0000004778 Generato dall'IA

Court dismisses claim for damages against police for alleged excessive force during arrest.

Numero d'incarto BS-1165/2010-VLR
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Danimarca (DK)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages alleging excessive force by police officers during an arrest. The plaintiff argued that the officers used unnecessary violence, while the defense contended the force was proportionate to the threat. The court ruled that the officers' actions were justified under the circumstances, thereby rejecting the compensation request.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Straffelovens § 29; § 1000, stk. 1, nr. 1; § 1000, stk. 2, nr. 1: Police use of force is lawful if proportionate to the threat, and damages are not awarded when the force meets this standard.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
police use of force excessive force claim proportionality principle criminal procedure law damages against state riesame di una decisione precedente riserva di modificazione rigetto definitivo dell'opposizione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Straffelovens § 29
§ 1000, stk. 1, nr. 1
§ 1000, stk. 2, nr. 1
Generato dall'IA
BS-28125/2023-VLR
Appeal dismissed because the lower court's ruling on suspensive effect requires Process Permission Board approval under § 389a.
BS-27589/2021-OLR
Appeal dismissed because plaintiff failed to file claims in the digital court portal as required by law.
SS-67/2014-HJR
Højesteret allows appeal against dismissal due to missing follow-up on original signed petition, remitting case for salary review.
BS-397/2011-OLR
Appeal court upholds lower court's decision to reopen a small claims case after default judgment. The court confirms the general right to request case reopening under the Code of Civil Procedure. The decision clarifies that small claims rules do not exclude the general reopening provision. The court notes the defendant requested reopening within the statutory time limit. The appeal court affirms the lower court's ruling on reopening the proceedings.
BS-9/2014-HJR
Court dismisses appeal on costs as original appeal covered entire lower court decision including costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Landsrettens afgørelse om at kæremålet afvises, tages ikke til følge