Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
6 B 44/10 Generato dall'IA

Fee exemption for secondary radio and television receivers in non-exclusive private areas

Numero d'incarto 6 B 44/10
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the applicant’s non-admission complaint and ordered the admission of revision to clarify a question of fundamental legal significance. The dispute concerned a radio and television fee assessment, specifically whether a novel receiving device located in a non-exclusive private area but assigned to a property where the fee payer maintains other private receiving devices constitutes a exempt secondary device under the Radio and Television Fee Statute. The court held that the matter required clarification under Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure because the existing case law had not sufficiently addressed the fee exemption status of such devices under Section 5(3) of the Radio and Television Fee Statute, thereby reversing the lower court’s refusal to allow the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Fee exemption for secondary radio and television receivers in non-exclusive private areas: The dispute concerned a radio and television fee assessment, specifically whether a novel receiving device located in a non-exclusive private area but assigned to a property where the fee payer maintains other private receiving devices constitutes a exempt secondary device under the Radio and Television Fee Statute. The court held that the matter required clarification under Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure because the existing case law had not sufficiently addressed the fee exemption status of such devices under Section 5(3) of the Radio and Television Fee Statute, thereby reversing the lower court’s refusal to allow the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
vertenza non amministrativa tassa amministrativa canone radiotelevisivo proprietà privata diritto all'antenna motivi di revisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for allowing the revision based on the fundamental significance of the legal dispute.
§ 52 Abs. 3 GKG
§ 52 Abs. 3 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung beruht auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 GKG
Basis for the final determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute.
Generato dall'IA
6 B 45/10, 6 B 45/10 (6 C 2/11)
Broadcasting Fee: Exemption of Non-Exclusively Private Reception Devices as Secondary Devices Under § 5 Abs. 3 RGebStV
6 B 79/09
Exemption from broadcasting fees for secondary devices under state treaty law and the constitutional financing guarantee
6 B 36/10, 6 B 36/10 (6 C 45/10)
Exemption of business-use internet-capable computer from broadcasting fee as a second device in shared domestic premises
6 C 45/10
Exemption of internet-enabled computers from broadcasting fees as secondary devices under mixed private and commercial use on the same property
6 B 51/16
Residence-based broadcasting fees: admissibility of non-admission appeal and hearing rights in parallel proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for allowing the revision based on the fundamental significance of the legal dispute.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 GKG

Basis for the final determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde; Rundfunkgebühr

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung des Rechtsstreits zuzulassen. Das angestrebte Revisionsverfahren kann zur Beantwortung der bisher in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts nicht ausreichend geklärten Frage beitragen, ob neuartige Rundfunkempfangsgeräte, die sich im nicht ausschließlich privaten Bereich befinden, aber einem Grundstück zugeordnet sind, auf dem der Gebührenpflichtige im privaten Bereich andere Rundfunkempfangsgeräte zum Empfang bereit hält, gemäß § 5 Abs. 3 RGebStV als Zweitgeräte von der Rundfunkgebühr befreit sind.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.