Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 122/09, 2 B 122/09 (2 C 46/10) Generato dall'IA

Eligibility for public servant health subsidies for implant-based dental prosthetics when non-salvageable residual teeth are scheduled for extraction after the healing phase

Numero d'incarto 2 B 122/09, 2 B 122/09 (2 C 46/10)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) admitted a revision appeal, allowing the case to proceed to the Senate for full examination after rejecting the opposing party's objection to the appeal's admissibility. The dispute concerns the denial of public service health subsidies (Beihilfe) for implant-based dental prosthetics, specifically challenging whether the presence of non-salvageable residual teeth, scheduled for extraction only at the end of the implant healing phase, constitutes a statutory bar to receiving financial assistance. The decision rests on the interpretation of the Federal Civil Servants' Health Subsidy Regulations (BhV/BBhV), focusing on the precise legal requirements for granting benefits under § 6 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 and Annex 2 No. 4 c for dental implants.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Eligibility for public servant health subsidies for implant-based dental prosthetics when non-salvageable residual teeth are scheduled for extraction after the healing phase: Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Das Revisionsverfahren kann Gelegenheit geben, die Anforderungen an die Gewährung von Beihilfen für implantatbasierten Zahnersatz (§ 6 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 BhV i. V. m. Anlage 2 Nr. 4 c BhV in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 1. November 2001, § 15 Abs. 1 Nr. 5 BBhV vom 13. Februar 2009) zu präzisieren. Insbesondere wird zu prüfen sein, ob das Vorhandensein eines nicht erhaltungswürdigen Restzahnbestands, der nach dem Behandlungsplan erst am Ende der Einheilphase der Implantate entfernt werden soll, einer Beihilfegewährung entgegen steht.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sovvenzione assicurazione di cure dentarie prestazione statutaria sanità pubblica servizio pubblico vertenza non amministrativa
Generato dall'IA
2 C 46/10
Subsidy eligibility for implant-supported total dental prostheses where residual teeth are removed during treatment
B 1 KR 5/21 BH
Statutory health insurance exclusion of dental implants unless part of a human-dental medical overall treatment
B 1 KR 8/21 R
Statutory health insurance exclusion of dental implants absent medical total treatment; constitutional equality under Art. 3 Abs. 1 GG
5 B 44/12
Exclusion of dental implant costs exceeding two per jaw from beihilfe eligibility; constitutional limits on state duty of care and legislative discretion
B 1 KR 19/12 R
Statutory coverage of dental implants: Requirement of a medical comprehensive treatment with a goal superseding restoration of masticatory function

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Beihilfe für implantologische Leistung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Das Revisionsverfahren kann Gelegenheit geben, die Anforderungen an die Gewährung von Beihilfen für implantatbasierten Zahnersatz (§ 6 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 BhV i. V. m. Anlage 2 Nr. 4 c BhV in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 1. November 2001, § 15 Abs. 1 Nr. 5 BBhV vom 13. Februar 2009) zu präzisieren. Insbesondere wird zu prüfen sein, ob das Vorhandensein eines nicht erhaltungswürdigen Restzahnbestands, der nach dem Behandlungsplan erst am Ende der Einheilphase der Implantate entfernt werden soll, einer Beihilfegewährung entgegen steht.