Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
4 B 5.25, 4 B 5.25 (4 C 2.26) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2026:080426B4B5.25.0 Generato dall'IA

Relationship between spatial planning and sector-specific law in approving deviations for urban development measures

Numero d'incarto 4 B 5.25, 4 B 5.25 (4 C 2.26)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court reversed the lower court’s refusal to admit the revision, granting the plaintiff’s leave-to-appeal application and setting the preliminary dispute value at €15,000. This decision arises from a dispute concerning the relationship between spatial planning law and sector-specific law in the context of approving a deviation from development goals for an urban development measure. The court found that the revision is admissible due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding the interaction between spatial planning and specialized regulations. The decisive legal basis includes § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO for the admission of the revision, and the substantive issue centers on §§ 2(1), 1(1) No. 4 and 2 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Act (UmwRG), § 6(2) of the Federal Spatial Planning Act (ROG), and § 165 of the Building Code (BauGB).

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 165 BauGB, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Relationship between spatial planning and sector-specific law in approving deviations for urban development measures: This decision arises from a dispute concerning the relationship between spatial planning law and sector-specific law in the context of approving a deviation from development goals for an urban development measure. The court found that the revision is admissible due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding the interaction between spatial planning and specialized regulations. The decisive legal basis includes § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO for the admission of the revision, and the substantive issue centers on §§ 2(1), 1(1) No. 4 and 2 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Act (UmwRG), § 6(2) of the Federal Spatial Planning Act (ROG), and § 165 of the Building Code (BauGB).

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
legge sulla pianificazione territoriale sviluppo urbano norme per l'edilizia valore litigioso procedura di revisione esame di impatto ambientale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
§ 165 BauGB
2 ROG für eine städtebauliche Entwicklungsmaßnahme nach § 165 BauGB geben.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provision cited for the preliminary determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provision cited for the preliminary determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Provision cited for the preliminary determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
4 BN 20.25, 4 BN 20.25 (4 CN 2.26)
Relationship between spatial planning law and specialized administrative law in authorizing target deviations for development measures
4 BN 21/22
Incidental review of binding spatial planning deviation in development plan challenge
4 BN 50/21, 4 BN 50/21 (4 CN 4/22)
Admission of revision on relation between regional planning and project-specific development plans and site designation requirements under § 12 Abs. 5 ROG
4 B 42/19, 4 B 42/19 (4 C 7/20)
Limitation of binding effect of spatial planning objectives to specific planning levels
4 BN 49/20
Determination of spatial planning objectives: Binding force of threshold values for residential land and the requirement of definitive calculation instructions in regional plans

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provision cited for the preliminary determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Provision cited for the preliminary determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provision cited for the preliminary determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Die Entscheidung über die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des Hessischen Verwaltungsgerichtshofs vom 14. November 2024 wird aufgehoben. Die Revision wird zugelassen.

Die Kostenentscheidung bleibt der Schlussentscheidung vorbehalten.

Der Wert des Streitgegenstandes wird für das Revisionsverfahren vorläufig auf 15 000 € festgesetzt.

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO).

Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich Gelegenheit zur Klärung der - im Rahmen von § 2 Abs. 1 i. V. m. § 1 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 4 und Satz 2 UmwRG aufgeworfenen - Frage nach dem Verhältnis von Raumordnungsrecht und Fachrecht bei der Zulassung einer Zielabweichung nach § 6 Abs. 2 ROG für eine städtebauliche Entwicklungsmaßnahme nach § 165 BauGB geben.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.