Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 39/23, 2 B 39/23 (2 C 1/24) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2024:300124B2B39.23.0 Generato dall'IA

Applicability of the principle of timely assertion to salary claims pending subsequent executive declaration

Numero d'incarto 2 B 39/23, 2 B 39/23 (2 C 1/24)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the plaintiff's leave to appeal, thereby overturning the higher administrative court’s decision that had refused to permit a revision. The dispute concerned a civil service claim for the supplementary payment ("Sonderzahlung") for 2008, where the lower court had likely dismissed the claim based on procedural or substantive grounds related to the timing of the assertion. The BVerwG found the appeal well-founded because the plaintiff demonstrated the question of fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, specifically whether the principle of timely assertion applies to salary claims whose legal basis exists but whose specific amount is determined only by a subsequent executive declaration. The case was remanded for the revision instance, with the dispute value provisionally set at €372.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Applicability of the principle of timely assertion to salary claims pending subsequent executive declaration: The dispute concerned a civil service claim for the supplementary payment ("Sonderzahlung") for 2008, where the lower court had likely dismissed the claim based on procedural or substantive grounds related to the timing of the assertion. The BVerwG found the appeal well-founded because the plaintiff demonstrated the question of fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, specifically whether the principle of timely assertion applies to salary claims whose legal basis exists but whose specific amount is determined only by a subsequent executive declaration. The case was remanded for the revision instance, with the dispute value provisionally set at €372.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
valore litigioso principio procedurale motivi di revisione determinazione del salario priorità del credito fiscale rinuncia a pretese di salario

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
The main ground for the verdict, as the court explicitly relied on this provision to grant leave for revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
3 Satz 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural provisions cited in the dispositive to determine the provisional dispute value for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
2 B 40/23, 2 B 40/23 (2 C 2/24)
Timeliness of claims for legally framed but administratively quantified public servant special payments under the principle of prompt assertion
2 B 5/21, 2 B 5/21 (2 C 24/21)
Applicability of the principle of prompt assertion to claims that pre-shift breaks under mandatory readiness are non-billable downtime rather than working time
2 B 22/16, 2 B 22/16 (2 C 60/16)
Promptness requirement for asserting increased overseas allowance under statutory grade assignment
2 C 31/09
Right to retroactive salary top-up for third child contingent on timely assertion of alimentary deficit
2 C 2/24
Sonderzahlung Aufstockungsbetrag: Prognostische Berechnung der Steuermehreinnahmen und Anwendbarkeit des Grundsatzes der zeitnahen Geltendmachung auf gesetzliche Besoldungsansprüche

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

The main ground for the verdict, as the court explicitly relied on this provision to grant leave for revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural provisions cited in the dispositive to determine the provisional dispute value for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Aufstockung der Sonderzahlung für 2008

[TENOR]

Die Entscheidung über die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des Oberverwaltungsgerichts Berlin-Brandenburg vom 30. August 2023 wird aufgehoben.

Die Revision wird zugelassen.

Die Entscheidung über die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens folgt der Kostenentscheidung in der Hauptsache.

Der Wert des Streitgegenstands für das Revisionsverfahren wird vorläufig auf 372 € festgesetzt.

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde der Klägerin ist begründet. Die Revision ist zuzulassen, weil die Klägerin eine grundsätzliche Bedeutung der Rechtssache i. S. v. § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO aufgezeigt hat. Das Verfahren kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage bieten, ob und ggf. unter welchen Voraussetzungen der Grundsatz der zeitnahen Geltendmachung auch auf Besoldungsansprüche Anwendung findet, für die zwar ein gesetzlicher Rahmen besteht, deren konkrete Höhe sich aber erst aus einer weiteren Festsetzung ergibt (hier der Bekanntmachung des für Finanzen zuständigen Mitglieds der Landesregierung nach § 7 Abs. 3 Brandenburgisches Sonderzahlungsgesetz für die Jahre 2007 bis 2009).

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.