Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 15/23, 2 B 15/23 (2 C 18/23) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2023:131223B2B15.23.0 Generato dall'IA

Admission of revision on bias of administrative officials in disciplinary proceedings and its impact on the legality of disciplinary orders

Numero d'incarto 2 B 15/23, 2 B 15/23 (2 C 18/23)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal, ordering the revocation of the Higher Administrative Court’s decision that had denied admission of the appeal, thereby allowing the plaintiff’s revision to proceed. The dispute concerns a disciplinary administrative order challenged by a public servant who argued that officials acting within the administrative disciplinary proceedings were biased. The court admitted the appeal under the provisions for matters of fundamental legal significance, holding that it remains to be clarified which weight bias in the administrative disciplinary procedure assigns to the legality of the resulting disciplinary order.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 67 LDR NRW und § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Admission of revision on bias of administrative officials in disciplinary proceedings and its impact on the legality of disciplinary orders: The dispute concerns a disciplinary administrative order challenged by a public servant who argued that officials acting within the administrative disciplinary proceedings were biased. The court admitted the appeal under the provisions for matters of fundamental legal significance, holding that it remains to be clarified which weight bias in the administrative disciplinary procedure assigns to the legality of the resulting disciplinary order.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca della decisione amministrativa procedura disciplinare procedura di revisione pubblici ufficiali oggetto della lite parzialità del giudice

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Die Revision wird wegen der von der Klägerin geltend gemachten grundsätzlichen Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 67 LDR NRW und § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zugelassen.
§ 67 LDR NRW und § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Ground for the admission of the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
Generato dall'IA
2 B 48/14, 2 B 48/14 (2 C 13/15)
Binding force of administrative decisions in disciplinary proceedings and constitutionality of exclusive executive disciplinary authority for dismissal
2 B 40/15
Admissibility of non-admission of revision in civil service disciplinary dismissal: defining procedural defects and divergence in the BDG
2 B 32/14
Disziplinarstrafbarkeit of process conduct: Prohibition against adverse evaluation of denial and lack of remorse in disciplinary sentencing
2 B 84/16
Admissibility of civil service disciplinary dismissal without equality officer participation and binding effect of medical findings on guilt
2 B 14/24, 2 B 14/24 (2 C 13/24)
Disciplinary liability of retired civil servants for post-service conduct versus statutory loss of rights

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 67 LDR NRW und § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Ground for the admission of the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Befangenheit im behördlichen Disziplinarverfahren

[TENOR]

Die Entscheidung des Oberverwaltungsgerichts für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen über die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil vom 30. November 2022 wird aufgehoben.

Die Revision wird zugelassen.

Die Entscheidung über die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens folgt der Kostenentscheidung in der Hauptsache.

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Klägerin ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision wird wegen der von der Klägerin geltend gemachten grundsätzlichen Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 67 LDR NRW und § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zugelassen.

Das Revisionsverfahren kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, welche Bedeutung es für die Rechtmäßigkeit einer Disziplinarverfügung hat, wenn im behördlichen Disziplinarverfahren handelnde Bedienstete des Dienstherrn unter Umständen befangen sind.