Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
7 B 2/23, 7 B 2/23 (7 C 5/23) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2023:301023B7B2.23.0 Generato dall'IA

Revision admissibility for Natura 2000 compatibility assessment where noise exceeds TA Lärm irrelevance threshold

Numero d'incarto 7 B 2/23, 7 B 2/23 (7 C 5/23)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) ordered the admission of the plaintiff's revision appeal, vacating the Higher Administrative Court for North Rhine-Westphalia's decision of 29 November 2022 that had denied such admission, thereby allowing the case to proceed to the federal level with a provisional subject matter value of €60,000. The dispute concerns a challenge to the absence of an appropriateness assessment for a planned project, specifically whether such an assessment is legally required when noise-induced impacts on a Natura 2000 site fall below an irrelevance threshold. The decisive legal basis identified for clarification is § 34(1) of the Federal Nature Conservation Act (BNatSchG) in conjunction with the noise relevance threshold defined in Nr. 3.2.1 Abs. 2 of the Technical Instruction on Noise Abatement (TA Lärm) from 1998.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG; Revision admissibility for Natura 2000 compatibility assessment where noise exceeds TA Lärm irrelevance threshold: The dispute concerns a challenge to the absence of an appropriateness assessment for a planned project, specifically whether such an assessment is legally required when noise-induced impacts on a Natura 2000 site fall below an irrelevance threshold. The decisive legal basis identified for clarification is § 34(1) of the Federal Nature Conservation Act (BNatSchG) in conjunction with the noise relevance threshold defined in Nr. 3.2.1 Abs. 2 of the Technical Instruction on Noise Abatement (TA Lärm) from 1998.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
accertamento dei rumori protezione della natura impugnazione di decisioni amministrative oggetto della lite soglia di rilevanza valore di pianificazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
The primary legal basis explicitly cited in the operative grounds for admitting the revision appeal due to the fundamental importance of the legal issue.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwertes beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG
The provisions cited to justify the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
9 B 14/13
Habitats Directive compatibility and right to be heard: substantive examination of species protection claims despite procedural prudence
7 B 13.25, 7 B 13.25 (7 C 1.26)
Admissibility of revision to resolve whether interconnected wind turbines on a shared site constitute a single facility for noise assessment under TA Lärm
4 B 77/09
Natura 2000 Compatibility Assessment: Priority of State Development Plans over Regional Plans, Scope of Habitats Directive Art. 6(4), and Species Protection Exception Requirements
4 B 7/20
Decisiveness of TA Lärm interpretation for non-admission of revision where day-time noise limits remain unexceeded
7 B 29/11, 7 B 29/11 (7 C 29/11)
Admissibility of revision on whether AVV-Baulärm intervention values define the noise tolerance threshold for retail spaces under § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG and § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

The primary legal basis explicitly cited in the operative grounds for admitting the revision appeal due to the fundamental importance of the legal issue.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG

The provisions cited to justify the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Verträglichkeitsprüfung nach § 34 Abs. 1 BNatSchG in Bezug auf schallbedingte Beeinträchtigungen eines Natura 2000-Gebiets

[TENOR]

Die Entscheidung des Oberverwaltungsgerichts für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen über die Nichtzulassung der Revision in seinem Urteil vom 29. November 2022 wird aufgehoben.

Die Revision wird zugelassen.

Die Kostenentscheidung bleibt der Endentscheidung vorbehalten.

Der Wert des Streitgegenstandes wird für das Revisionsverfahren vorläufig auf 60 000 € festgesetzt.

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision ist auf die Beschwerde des Klägers wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob und gegebenenfalls unter welchen Voraussetzungen eine Verträglichkeitsprüfung nach § 34 Abs. 1 BNatSchG in Bezug auf schallbedingte Beeinträchtigungen eines Natura 2000-Gebiets nicht geboten ist, weil die projektbedingte Zusatzbelastung des Gebiets eine Irrelevanzschwelle entsprechend Nr. 3.2.1 Abs. 2 der Sechsten Allgemeinen Verwaltungsvorschrift zum Bundes-Immissionsschutzgesetz (Technische Anleitung zum Schutz gegen Lärm - TA Lärm) vom 26. August 1998 (GMBl. S. 503) unterschreitet.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwertes beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.