Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 22/21, 2 B 22/21 (2 C 3/22) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2022:010322B2B22.21.0 Generato dall'IA

Service accident eligibility for bodily injury from post-verbal altercation: interpreting "in the course of duty" under BeamtVG

Numero d'incarto 2 B 22/21, 2 B 22/21 (2 C 3/22)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) ordered that the appeal to revision be allowed, reversing the lower court's decision to deny such leave, and set the amount in dispute at €5,000. The underlying dispute concerns whether a civil servant’s bodily injury sustained after a physical altercation with colleagues, triggered by a verbal joke, qualifies as a service accident (“Dienstunfall”) and is therefore covered by official liability or compensation. The court admitted the revision due to the fundamental legal significance of determining how to interpret the statutory requirement of acting “in the course of duty” (§ 31 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BeamtVG) in scenarios involving verbal exchanges and subsequent unilateral physical impact.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG; Service accident eligibility for bodily injury from post-verbal altercation: interpreting "in the course of duty" under BeamtVG: The underlying dispute concerns whether a civil servant’s bodily injury sustained after a physical altercation with colleagues, triggered by a verbal joke, qualifies as a service accident (“Dienstunfall”) and is therefore covered by official liability or compensation. The court admitted the revision due to the fundamental legal significance of determining how to interpret the statutory requirement of acting “in the course of duty” (§ 31 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BeamtVG) in scenarios involving verbal exchanges and subsequent unilateral physical impact.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
risarcimento del danno alla persona causa civile doveri del funzionario obbligo legale revisione di una decisione reati contro i doveri di servizio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Basis for allowing the revision due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.
§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG
3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG (vgl.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG
Legal basis for setting the value of the dispute at €5,000.
§ 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG
Legal basis for the preliminary setting of the value of the dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
2 C 3/22
Service accident coverage for employee injury during colleague altercation following provocative remarks
4 StR 197/17
Dangerous bodily injury: Imminence of unlawful attack and assessment of the combat situation for justifiable self-defense
4 StR 166/19
Gefährliche Körperverletzung in Notwehrlage: Erlaubnistatbestandsirrtum über Hinzutreten eines weiteren Angreifers
2 C 41/11
Qualified service accident: defining unlawful attack under § 37 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 BeamtVG for enhanced accident pension
2 B 3/18
Service meeting as external influence in service accident law: social adequacy threshold for non-physical interventions under civil servant accident protection

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for allowing the revision due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG

Legal basis for setting the value of the dispute at €5,000.

§ 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG

Legal basis for the preliminary setting of the value of the dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Körperschaden aufgrund einer Rangelei unter Kollegen nach einem Scherz als Dienstunfall?

[TENOR]

Die Entscheidung über die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des Oberverwaltungsgerichts Berlin-Brandenburg vom 19. März 2021 wird aufgehoben.

Die Revision wird zugelassen.

Die Entscheidung über die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens folgt der Kostenentscheidung in der Hauptsache.

Der Wert des Streitgegenstandes wird für das Beschwerdeverfahren und - insoweit vorläufig - für das Revisionsverfahren auf 5 000 € festgesetzt.

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren gibt Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Frage, wie im Dienstunfallrecht das gesetzliche Merkmal "in Ausübung des Dienstes" (§ 31 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BeamtVG) in der Konstellation einer verbalen Äußerung eines Beamten gegenüber anderen und sich daran anschließender einseitiger körperlicher Einwirkung dieser, aufgrund derer ersterer einen Körperschaden erleidet, auszulegen ist.

Die Festsetzung des Werts des Streitgegenstandes beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG (vgl. Nummer 10.8 des Streitwertkatalogs 2013 für die Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit). Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG.