Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 B 76/21, 1 B 76/21 (1 C 53/21) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2021:071221B1B76.21.0 Generato dall'IA

Standard of proof for "strong presumption" linking military service refusal to persecution under Qualification Directive

Numero d'incarto 1 B 76/21, 1 B 76/21 (1 C 53/21)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) overturned the Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg’s refusal to admit an appeal to the higher courts and granted the defendant’s request to allow a full appeal (Revision), deferring the cost allocation to the final judgment on the merits. The dispute, originating from an asylum application decision, concerns the standard of evidence required to presume a nexus between a refusal to perform military service under the specific circumstances defined in the EU Qualification Directive and one of the prohibited grounds of persecution, and the subsequent burden of rebutting this presumption. The court admitted the appeal under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, citing the fundamental importance of the legal question regarding the application of the "strong presumption" established by the Court of Justice of the European Union and its specific impact on judicial conviction formation under § 108 Abs. 1 VwGO.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 3a Abs. 2 Nr. 5 AsylG, § 3b AsylG, § 108 Abs. 1 VwGO; Standard of proof for "strong presumption" linking military service refusal to persecution under Qualification Directive: The dispute, originating from an asylum application decision, concerns the standard of evidence required to presume a nexus between a refusal to perform military service under the specific circumstances defined in the EU Qualification Directive and one of the prohibited grounds of persecution, and the subsequent burden of rebutting this presumption. The court admitted the appeal under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, citing the fundamental importance of the legal question regarding the application of the "strong presumption" established by the Court of Justice of the European Union and its specific impact on judicial conviction formation under § 108 Abs. 1 VwGO.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prova della persecuzione onere della prova servizio militare legge sull'asilo presunzione direttiva qualifiche

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, explicitly cited as the legal basis for admitting the Revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 3a Abs. 2 Nr. 5 AsylG
e der Richtlinie 2011/95/EU (§ 3a Abs. 2 Nr. 5 AsylG) genannten Voraussetzungen mit einem der in Art.
§ 3b AsylG
§ 3b AsylG) genannten Verfolgungsgründe - sowie deren Widerlegung - zu stellen sind und welche Bedeutung einer solchen "starken Vermutung" im Rahmen der richterlichen Überzeugungsbildung (§ 108 Abs.
§ 108 Abs. 1 VwGO
§ 3b AsylG) genannten Verfolgungsgründe - sowie deren Widerlegung - zu stellen sind und welche Bedeutung einer solchen "starken Vermutung" im Rahmen der richterlichen Überzeugungsbildung (§ 108 Abs. 1 VwGO) zukommt.
Generato dall'IA
1 B 59/21, 1 B 59/21 (1 C 46/21)
Standard of proof for "strong presumption" linking military service refusal to persecution grounds under the Qualification Directive
1 B 46/21, 1 B 46/21 (1 C 38/21)
Standard for "strong presumption" linking refusal of military service to a persecution ground under the Qualification Directive
1 B 73/21, 1 B 73/21 (1 C 51/21)
Standard for "strong presumption" linking military service refusal to persecution under Directive 2011/95/EU
1 B 68/21, 1 B 68/21 (1 C 58/21)
Standard for establishing a "strong presumption" of persecution nexus for refusal of military service under the Qualification Directive
1 B 51/21, 1 B 51/21 (1 C 34/21)
Refusal of military service: evidentiary requirements for a "strong presumption" of persecution and its weight in judicial fact-finding under the Qualification Directive

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, explicitly cited as the legal basis for admitting the Revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Die Entscheidung des Oberverwaltungsgerichts Berlin-Brandenburg über die Nichtzulassung der Revision gegen sein Urteil vom 12. Mai 2021 wird aufgehoben.

Die Revision wird zugelassen.

Die Entscheidung über die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens folgt der Kostenentscheidung in der Hauptsache.

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet.

Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat insgesamt Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, welche Anforderungen an die Annahme einer "starken Vermutung" (EuGH, Urteil vom 19. November 2020 - C-238/19 [ECLI:EU:C:2020:945] - Rn. 57) für eine Verknüpfung zwischen der Verweigerung des Militärdienstes unter den in Art. 9 Abs. 2 Buchst. e der Richtlinie 2011/95/EU (§ 3a Abs. 2 Nr. 5 AsylG) genannten Voraussetzungen mit einem der in Art. 10 der Richtlinie 2011/95/EU (§ 3a Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 3b AsylG) genannten Verfolgungsgründe - sowie deren Widerlegung - zu stellen sind und welche Bedeutung einer solchen "starken Vermutung" im Rahmen der richterlichen Überzeugungsbildung (§ 108 Abs. 1 VwGO) zukommt.