Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 B 69/21, 1 B 69/21 (1 C 48/21) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2021:231121B1B69.21.0 Generato dall'IA

Admissibility of revision on whether a "strong presumption" links refusal of military service to EU persecution grounds for refugee status

Numero d'incarto 1 B 69/21, 1 B 69/21 (1 C 48/21)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court set aside the appellate court's decision denying leave to appeal and admitted the revision, leaving the procedural outcome of the main asylum case pending for the appellate court to re-examine on the merits. The dispute concerned a refugee's claim for protection based on conscientious objection to military service, specifically challenging whether the rejection of the duty fulfilled the criteria for persecution under EU law. The court held that the question of what constitutes a "strong presumption" linking refusal of military service under specific political conditions to one of the persecution grounds listed in Article 10 of Directive 2011/95/EU, and the evidentiary weight of such a presumption in judicial fact-finding, is of fundamental legal significance under Section 132(2)(1) of the Administrative Court Rules of Procedure.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 3a Abs. 2 Nr. 5 AsylG, § 3b AsylG, § 108 Abs. 1 VwGO; Admissibility of revision on whether a "strong presumption" links refusal of military service to EU persecution grounds for refugee status: The dispute concerned a refugee's claim for protection based on conscientious objection to military service, specifically challenging whether the rejection of the duty fulfilled the criteria for persecution under EU law. The court held that the question of what constitutes a "strong presumption" linking refusal of military service under specific political conditions to one of the persecution grounds listed in Article 10 of Directive 2011/95/EU, and the evidentiary weight of such a presumption in judicial fact-finding, is of fundamental legal significance under Section 132(2)(1) of the Administrative Court Rules of Procedure.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revisione in materia d'asilo persecuzione motivi di revisione presunzione rifiuto del servizio militare rifugiato

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Provision cited as the main legal basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
§ 3a Abs. 2 Nr. 5 AsylG
e der Richtlinie 2011/95/EU (§ 3a Abs. 2 Nr. 5 AsylG) genannten Voraussetzungen mit einem der in Art.
§ 3b AsylG
§ 3b AsylG) genannten Verfolgungsgründe - sowie deren Widerlegung - zu stellen sind und welche Bedeutung einer solchen "starken Vermutung" im Rahmen der richterlichen Überzeugungsbildung (§ 108 Abs.
§ 108 Abs. 1 VwGO
§ 3b AsylG) genannten Verfolgungsgründe - sowie deren Widerlegung - zu stellen sind und welche Bedeutung einer solchen "starken Vermutung" im Rahmen der richterlichen Überzeugungsbildung (§ 108 Abs. 1 VwGO) zukommt.
Generato dall'IA
1 B 81/21, 1 B 81/21 (1 C 2/22)
Standard for "strong presumption" linking refusal of military service to persecution grounds under refugee law
1 B 44/21, 1 B 44/21 (1 C 37/21)
Admissibility of revision to define standards for the "strong presumption" linking refusal of military service to a persecution ground under the Qualification Directive
1 B 54/21, 1 B 54/21 (1 C 35/21)
Admission of revision on evidentiary weight of "strong presumption" for persecution nexus in refusal of military service
1 B 77/21, 1 B 77/21 (1 C 55/21)
Admissibility of revision for clarifying the evidentiary weight of the "strong presumption" linking military service refusal to persecution under the Qualification Directive
1 B 58/21, 1 B 58/21 (1 C 44/21)
Admissibility of revision to clarify evidentiary standard for "strong presumption" linking military service refusal in Syria to persecution under Directive 2011/95/EU

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Provision cited as the main legal basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Die Entscheidung des Oberverwaltungsgerichts Berlin-Brandenburg über die Nichtzulassung der Revision gegen sein Urteil vom 17. Mai 2021 wird aufgehoben.

Die Revision wird zugelassen.

Die Entscheidung über die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens folgt der Kostenentscheidung in der Hauptsache.

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet.

Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat insgesamt Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, welche Anforderungen an die Annahme einer "starken Vermutung" (EuGH, Urteil vom 19. November 2020 - C-238/19 [ECLI:EU:C:2020:945] - Rn. 57) für eine Verknüpfung zwischen der Verweigerung des Militärdienstes unter den in Art. 9 Abs. 2 Buchst. e der Richtlinie 2011/95/EU (§ 3a Abs. 2 Nr. 5 AsylG) genannten Voraussetzungen mit einem der in Art. 10 der Richtlinie 2011/95/EU (§ 3a Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 3b AsylG) genannten Verfolgungsgründe - sowie deren Widerlegung - zu stellen sind und welche Bedeutung einer solchen "starken Vermutung" im Rahmen der richterlichen Überzeugungsbildung (§ 108 Abs. 1 VwGO) zukommt.