Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
3 B 7/20, 3 B 7/20 (3 C 6/21) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2021:290621B3B7.20.0 Generato dall'IA

Temporal basis for lawfulness of administrative orders repeating Animal Welfare-Useful Animal Keeping Regulation requirements

Numero d'incarto 3 B 7/20, 3 B 7/20 (3 C 6/21)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court quashed the lower court's refusal to allow an appeal and permitted the plaintiff's revision, with the cost burden to be determined in the main proceedings. The dispute involves a challenge to an administrative order issued under the Animal Welfare Law regarding specific requirements for keeping farm animals, as stipulated in the Animal Welfare-Useful Animal Keeping Regulation. The decisive legal basis for this procedural ruling is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, as the court determined that the revision was necessary to clarify which point in time is decisive for assessing the lawfulness of such an order when it repeats requirements already regulated in existing legislation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG; Temporal basis for lawfulness of administrative orders repeating Animal Welfare-Useful Animal Keeping Regulation requirements: The dispute involves a challenge to an administrative order issued under the Animal Welfare Law regarding specific requirements for keeping farm animals, as stipulated in the Animal Welfare-Useful Animal Keeping Regulation. The decisive legal basis for this procedural ruling is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, as the court determined that the revision was necessary to clarify which point in time is decisive for assessing the lawfulness of such an order when it repeats requirements already regulated in existing legislation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
decisioni incidentali controlli ufficiali, controlli veterinari legislazione veterinaria procedura di revisione spese amministrative regolamentazione della caccia

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Legal basis for the admission of the revision, cited in the reasoning associated with the dispositive order to allow the appeal.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
Generato dall'IA
3 B 8/20, 3 B 8/20 (3 C 7/21)
Timing of lawfulness for animal welfare orders reiterating livestock housing requirements under the Animal Protection Act
3 B 34/16
Scope of "repeated violation" in animal welfare bans and requirements for comprehensive care prohibitions under § 16a TierSchG
3 B 39/16, 3 B 39/16 (3 C 29/16)
Permissibility of culling chicks under German Animal Welfare Act: defining "reasonable ground" and the weight of economic interests
7 C 5/11
Sale of animals without prior administrative act under Animal Protection Act: scope of § 16a TierSchG and limits of immediate execution
3 B 20/15, 3 B 20/15 (3 C 1/16)
Compatibility of Mink Farming Regulations with Legislative Reservation When Commercial Viability Is Undermined

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Legal basis for the admission of the revision, cited in the reasoning associated with the dispositive order to allow the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Tierschutz

[TENOR]

Die Entscheidung des Niedersächsischen Oberverwaltungsgerichts über die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Beschluss vom 29. November 2019 wird aufgehoben.

Die Revision wird zugelassen.

Die Entscheidung über die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens folgt der Kostenentscheidung in der Hauptsache.

Der Wert des Streitgegenstandes wird für das Revisionsverfahren vorläufig auf 5 000 € festgesetzt.

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde der Klägerin ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren wird dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht voraussichtlich Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, welcher Zeitpunkt für die Rechtmäßigkeit einer auf § 16a Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Satz 2 Nr. 1 i.V.m. § 2 Nr. 1 TierSchG gestützten Anordnung maßgebend ist, die den Inhalt bestimmter in der Tierschutz-Nutztierhaltungsverordnung geregelter Anforderungen wiederholt.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.