Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
4 BN 1/20, 4 BN 1/20 (4 CN 1/21) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2021:130121B4BN1.20.0 Generato dall'IA

Relationship between private green space and community facility designations in town planning; requirements for necessity of community area allocations under § 9 BauGB

Numero d'incarto 4 BN 1/20, 4 BN 1/20 (4 CN 1/21)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) reversed the lower court’s refusal to grant leave for appeal and admitted the revision, siding with the objecting party in the review proceedings. The dispute concerns a German public law challenge regarding town planning, specifically the interrelationship between the designation of private green spaces and the designation of areas for community facilities in a development plan. The decisive legal basis rests on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which allows leave for appeal where the case has fundamental significance; the court determined that the revision will clarify the legal requirements for the necessity of designating community facilities under § 9 Abs. 1 Nr. 22 BauGB in relation to private green spaces under § 9 Abs. 1 Nr. 15 BauGB.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 133 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 9 Abs. 1 Nr. 15 BauGB, § 9 Abs. 1 Nr. 22 BauGB, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO; Relationship between private green space and community facility designations in town planning; requirements for necessity of community area allocations under § 9 BauGB: The dispute concerns a German public law challenge regarding town planning, specifically the interrelationship between the designation of private green spaces and the designation of areas for community facilities in a development plan. The decisive legal basis rests on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which allows leave for appeal where the case has fundamental significance; the court determined that the revision will clarify the legal requirements for the necessity of designating community facilities under § 9 Abs. 1 Nr. 22 BauGB in relation to private green spaces under § 9 Abs. 1 Nr. 15 BauGB.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
spazio verde testamento pubblico diritto dello spazio utilizzazione del fondo procedura di revisione reclamo amministrativo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 133 Abs. 1 VwGO
1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO zulässige Beschwerde ist begründet.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, justifying the admission of the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
§ 9 Abs. 1 Nr. 15 BauGB
Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, in welchem Verhältnis die Festsetzung einer privaten Grünfläche nach § 9 Abs. 1 Nr. 15 BauGB zu der Festsetzung von Flächen für Gemeinschaftsanlagen nach § 9 Abs.
§ 9 Abs. 1 Nr. 22 BauGB
15 BauGB zu der Festsetzung von Flächen für Gemeinschaftsanlagen nach § 9 Abs. 1 Nr. 22 BauGB steht und welche Anforderungen an die Erforderlichkeit der Festsetzung von Flächen für Gemeinschaftsanlagen zu stellen sind.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO
Provisions cited to establish the admissibility of the complaint against the refusal of leave for appeal.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
4 BN 2/20, 4 BN 2/20 (4 CN 2/21)
Interplay of private green space and communal facility designations under BauGB §§ 9(1) No. 15 and No. 22
4 CN 1/21
Zoning validity of communal residential green areas designated as private green spaces under § 9(1) No. 15 BauGB
4 BN 10/11
Designation of private park facilities as green areas under § 9 No. 15 BauGB
4 BN 2/17
Permissible built structures in public green areas and the limits of § 9 No. 15 BauGB versus urban planning necessity under § 1 (3) BauGB
4 BN 21/20
Bebauungsplan validity: weighting of nature conservation avoidance measures under § 1a Abs. 3 BauGB and their requirement for binding zoning determinations

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO

Provisions cited to establish the admissibility of the complaint against the refusal of leave for appeal.

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, justifying the admission of the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Verhältnis der Festsetzungen von Grün- und Gemeinschaftsflächen

[TENOR]

Auf die Beschwerde der Antragsgegnerin wird die Entscheidung über die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des Bayerischen Verwaltungsgerichtshofs vom 17. Oktober 2019 aufgehoben.

Die Revision wird zugelassen.

Die Kostenentscheidung bleibt der Schlussentscheidung vorbehalten.

Der Wert des Streitgegenstandes wird für das Revisionsverfahren vorläufig auf 20 000 € festgesetzt.

[GRUENDE]

Die nach § 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO zulässige Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, in welchem Verhältnis die Festsetzung einer privaten Grünfläche nach § 9 Abs. 1 Nr. 15 BauGB zu der Festsetzung von Flächen für Gemeinschaftsanlagen nach § 9 Abs. 1 Nr. 22 BauGB steht und welche Anforderungen an die Erforderlichkeit der Festsetzung von Flächen für Gemeinschaftsanlagen zu stellen sind.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.