Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
5 PB 2/20, 5 PB 2/20 (5 P 10/20) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2020:171220B5PB2.20.0 Generato dall'IA

Scope of § 48 Abs. 2 Satz 2 SächsPersVG protection for substitute personnel council members

Numero d'incarto 5 PB 2/20, 5 PB 2/20 (5 P 10/20)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court ordered the admission of a legal appeal (Rechtsbeschwerde), overturning the Saxon Superior Administrative Court's prior non-admission decision and allowing the applicant to proceed. The dispute concerns a personnel council member’s application for permission to lodge a legal appeal regarding a labor-law matter involving staff council representation. The admission was granted based on § 88(2) of the Saxon Personnel Representation Act in conjunction with § 72(2) No. 1 and § 92(1) Sentence 2 of the Labor Court Act, citing a question of fundamental significance: whether and under what conditions substitute members of the personnel council are protected under § 48(2) Sentence 2 of the Saxon Personnel Representation Act.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG; Scope of § 48 Abs. 2 Satz 2 SächsPersVG protection for substitute personnel council members: The dispute concerns a personnel council member’s application for permission to lodge a legal appeal regarding a labor-law matter involving staff council representation. The admission was granted based on § 88(2) of the Saxon Personnel Representation Act in conjunction with § 72(2) No. 1 and § 92(1) Sentence 2 of the Labor Court Act, citing a question of fundamental significance: whether and under what conditions substitute members of the personnel council are protected under § 48(2) Sentence 2 of the Saxon Personnel Representation Act.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
estensione della protezione professioni amministrative rappresentanza legale oggetto della lite doveri e diritti dell'agente disposizioni speciali per il Lussemburgo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG
1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.
Generato dall'IA
5 P 10/20
Protective scope for substitute personnel council members under § 48(2) SächsPersVG and the procedural nature of the consent requirement for personnel transfers
2 AZR 233/11
Personenbedingte Kündigung: scope of special termination protection for substitute works council members who performed no actual duties
5 P 6/15
§ 47 Abs. 4 PersVG BB: Scope of "regular participation" for substitute staff council members and the prognosis standard for consent to transfers
5 PB 2.25, 5 PB 2.25 (5 P 2.25)
Voting and eligibility rights of employees assigned to one self-standing department but performing duties in another under SächsPersVG §§ 13, 14, 6
6 PB 12/13, 6 PB 12/13 (6 P 10/13)
Protection against termination for substitute youth representatives under public service law

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 88 Abs. 2 SächsPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG

Basis for admitting the legal appeal due to a question of fundamental significance.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Zulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde; Zustimmungserfordernis; Ersatzmitglieder des Personalrats

[TENOR]

Die Nichtzulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde in dem Beschluss des Sächsischen Oberverwaltungsgerichts vom 24. Oktober 2019 wird aufgehoben.

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers wird zugelassen.

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers ist gemäß § 88 Abs. 2 SächsPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.

Die vorliegende Rechtssache kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob und unter welchen Voraussetzungen Ersatzmitglieder des Personalrats vom Schutz des § 48 Abs. 2 Satz 2 SächsPersVG erfasst werden.