Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 16/20, 2 B 16/20 (2 C 12/20) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2020:270520B2B16.20.0 Generato dall'IA

Admissibility of declaratory action for unlawfulness of academic selection decision after aborted recruitment due to preliminary injunction

Numero d'incarto 2 B 16/20, 2 B 16/20 (2 C 12/20)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court ordered the admission of the appeal (Revision) and overturned the lower court’s refusal to permit it, effectively allowing the proceeding to advance to the next level. The case concerns a declaratory action for the continuation of a legal situation (Fortsetzungsfeststellungsklage) brought by a candidate not selected for a professorship, who sought to establish the unlawfulness of the selection decision to support a subsequent liability claim based on Article 33(2) of the German Basic Law. The specific factual context involves the employer’s abortment of the recruitment process following the issuance of a preliminary injunction that temporarily prohibited the appointment of the originally chosen candidate. The decision rests on the ground that the case is of fundamental legal significance (§ 132(2) No. 1 VwGO), requiring clarification on the prerequisites for a non-selected applicant to obtain a judicial declaration of the illegality of a selection decision in administrative courts when the hiring procedure has been terminated due to such an interim measure.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, Art. 33 Abs. 2 GG; Admissibility of declaratory action for unlawfulness of academic selection decision after aborted recruitment due to preliminary injunction: The case concerns a declaratory action for the continuation of a legal situation (Fortsetzungsfeststellungsklage) brought by a candidate not selected for a professorship, who sought to establish the unlawfulness of the selection decision to support a subsequent liability claim based on Article 33(2) of the German Basic Law. The specific factual context involves the employer’s abortment of the recruitment process following the issuance of a preliminary injunction that temporarily prohibited the appointment of the originally chosen candidate. The decision rests on the ground that the case is of fundamental legal significance (§ 132(2) No. 1 VwGO), requiring clarification on the prerequisites for a non-selected applicant to obtain a judicial declaration of the illegality of a selection decision in administrative courts when the hiring procedure has been terminated due to such an interim measure.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
decisione di accertamento occupazione provvisoria diritto processuale procedimento di nomina procedimento pregiudiziale motivi di revisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Grounds for admitting the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
Art. 33 Abs. 2 GG
Das Verfahren erscheint geeignet, zur weiteren Klärung beizutragen, unter welchen Voraussetzungen eine bei einer Auswahlentscheidung nicht berücksichtigte Bewerberin im Hinblick auf den bei den ordentlichen Gerichten wegen der Verletzung ihres Rechts aus Art. 33 Abs.
Generato dall'IA
IV AR (VZ) 2/12
Admissibility of declaratory relief for review of arbitrary selection of court-appointed compulsory administrators
2 C 30/15
Academic recruitment: admissibility of evaluating only published works and timing of interim legal remedy for rejected candidates
2 A 5/22
Declaratory judgment ineligibility after realization of promotional military staff assignment due to lack of interest in legal establishment
1 BvR 3606/13
Preliminary injunction to block professor appointment: irreversibility of right to effective judicial review outweighs delay in public service recruitment
2 C 12/20
No state liability for lawful abortion of selection procedure following provisional ban on appointment based on procedural error under Art. 33(2) GG

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Grounds for admitting the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Fortsetzungsfeststellungsklage nach Abbruch eines Auswahlverfahrens betreffend eine Professorenstelle; Revisionszulassung

[TENOR]

Die Entscheidung des Oberverwaltungsgerichts Berlin-Brandenburg über die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil vom 7. November 2019 wird aufgehoben.

Die Revision wird zugelassen.

Die Entscheidung über die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens folgt der Kostenentscheidung in der Hauptsache.

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision wird wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zugelassen.

Das Verfahren erscheint geeignet, zur weiteren Klärung beizutragen, unter welchen Voraussetzungen eine bei einer Auswahlentscheidung nicht berücksichtigte Bewerberin im Hinblick auf den bei den ordentlichen Gerichten wegen der Verletzung ihres Rechts aus Art. 33 Abs. 2 GG geltend gemachten Haftungsanspruch vor den Verwaltungsgerichten die Rechtswidrigkeit der Auswahlentscheidung feststellen lassen kann. Es geht um die Fallkonstellation, dass der Dienstherr das Verfahren im Anschluss an den von dieser Bewerberin erwirkten Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung abgebrochen hat, mit der dem Dienstherrn vorläufig untersagt worden ist, die ausgeschriebene Stelle mit dem von ihm ausgewählten Bewerber zu besetzen.