Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
5 B 2/20, 5 B 2/20 (5 C 5/20) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2020:080420B5B2.20.0 Generato dall'IA

Relationship between authorization bases in § 16(3) and (4) sentence 1 AFBG and its impact on information duties

Numero d'incarto 5 B 2/20, 5 B 2/20 (5 C 5/20)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) overturned the OVG for North Rhine-Westphalia's decision to deny leave to appeal and ordered the admission of the revision proceedings. The dispute concerns the interpretation of the Federal Nursing Home Act (AFBG), specifically regarding the statutory powers for facility approvals and the associated information duties. The decisive legal basis is § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO, which grants leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of clarifying the relationship between the authorization grounds in § 16(3) and § 16(4) sentence 1 AFBG and the potential impact on the application of the information duty under § 16(4) sentence 2 AFBG.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Relationship between authorization bases in § 16(3) and (4) sentence 1 AFBG and its impact on information duties: The dispute concerns the interpretation of the Federal Nursing Home Act (AFBG), specifically regarding the statutory powers for facility approvals and the associated information duties. The decisive legal basis is § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO, which grants leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of clarifying the relationship between the authorization grounds in § 16(3) and § 16(4) sentence 1 AFBG and the potential impact on the application of the information duty under § 16(4) sentence 2 AFBG.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
base legale motivi di revisione accesso ai documenti ufficiali autorità amministrativa lavoro sottoposto ad autorizzazione potere di decisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, cited in the dispositive order to justify the admission of the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
Generato dall'IA
6 B 28/22
Insufficiency of reasoning for refusing BVerfSchG information request due to risk of source endangerment and operational exposure.
7 B 20/14, 7 B 20/14 (7 C 2/15)
Admissibility of revision on the exclusion grounds and scope of application of the Freedom of Information Act (IFG)
6 B 18/13, 6 B 18/13 (6 C 28/13)
Scope of authorization for issuing access restriction orders under Art. 297 Abs. 1 EGStGB
20 F 8/12
Freedom of Information Act access to collegiate body minutes: decision-relevance prerequisite for intermediate proceedings on evidentiary access.
7 B 6/17, 7 B 6/17 (7 C 29/17)
Scope of exclusion grounds and requirement of a final administrative act for free access to information under VIG

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, cited in the dispositive order to justify the admission of the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Verhältnis der Ermächtigungsgrundlagen des § 16 Abs. 3 und 4 Satz 1 AFBG zueinander

[TENOR]

Die Entscheidung des Oberverwaltungsgerichts für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen über die Nichtzulassung der Revision gegen sein Urteil vom 6. November 2019 wird aufgehoben.

Die Revision wird zugelassen.

Die Entscheidung über die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens folgt der Kostenentscheidung in der Hauptsache.

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision gegen das Urteil des Oberverwaltungsgerichts für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen vom 6. November 2019 ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, in welchem Verhältnis die Ermächtigungsgrundlagen des § 16 Abs. 3 und 4 Satz 1 AFBG zueinander stehen und wie sich dies gegebenenfalls auf die Anwendung der Hinweispflicht des § 16 Abs. 4 Satz 2 AFBG auswirkt.