Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 B 9/20, 1 B 9/20 (1 C 5/20) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2020:260220B1B9.20.0 Generato dall'IA

Sufficiency of B1 German language proficiency as a "declaration by other means" to revoke non-German ethnicity entries under the Nationality Act

Numero d'incarto 1 B 9/20, 1 B 9/20 (1 C 5/20)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) overturned the Higher Administrative Court’s refusal to admit an appeal and ordered that the case be remanded for further review, effectively ruling in favor of the complainant. The dispute concerned an individual’s attempt to amend a recorded non-German ethnicity (Volkstum) entry in their civil registry, specifically whether demonstrating German language proficiency at the B1 level of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages constitutes a valid "declaration by other means" under the relevant nationality statutes to revoke previous statements of affiliation. The BVerwG held that the issue possessed fundamental legal significance, requiring clarification on whether such language certification satisfies the statutory requirements for modifying ethnic designations, and accordingly ordered the admission of the revision proceeding under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Sufficiency of B1 German language proficiency as a "declaration by other means" to revoke non-German ethnicity entries under the Nationality Act: The dispute concerned an individual’s attempt to amend a recorded non-German ethnicity (Volkstum) entry in their civil registry, specifically whether demonstrating German language proficiency at the B1 level of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages constitutes a valid "declaration by other means" under the relevant nationality statutes to revoke previous statements of affiliation. The BVerwG held that the issue possessed fundamental legal significance, requiring clarification on whether such language certification satisfies the statutory requirements for modifying ethnic designations, and accordingly ordered the admission of the revision proceeding under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
nazionalità requisito legale utilizzazione delle lingue discriminazione linguistica divieto di espulsione dei cittadini vertenza non amministrativa

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
The legal basis cited in the grounds for the dispositive order to admit the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
Generato dall'IA
1 C 5/20
Late-comer status: insufficiency of B1 language skills to overcome explicit counter-confession to non-German nationality
1 C 8/09
Family reunification: validity of pre-entry language requirement and inapplicability of EU nationality non-discrimination to third-country nationals
1 B 61/21
Resettlement status: admissibility of complaint challenging sufficiency of evidence for overcoming counter-declaration of foreign ethnicity
1 B 2/16, 1 B 2/16, 1 PKH 2/16
German ethnicity admission certificate: lack of interest in justice does not arise from failure to provide B1 language proof where alternative certification methods exist
1 C 36/16
Late resettlement hardship inclusion: requirement of basic German language skills at time of entry and scope of special hardship

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

The legal basis cited in the grounds for the dispositive order to admit the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Erfolgreiche Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde zu dem Erfordernis der Änderung eines Nationalitäteneintrags im Zusammenhang mit einem Bekenntnis auf sonstige Weise

[TENOR]

Die Entscheidung des Oberverwaltungsgerichts für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen über die Nichtzulassung der Revision gegen sein Urteil vom 13. November 2019 wird aufgehoben.

Die Revision wird zugelassen.

Die Entscheidung über die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens folgt der Kostenentscheidung in der Hauptsache.

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann der Klärung der Frage dienen, ob ein Bekenntnis auf andere Weise im Sinne des § 6 Abs. 2 Satz 1 i.V.m. Satz 2 Alt. 1 BVFG in Gestalt des Nachweises von deutschen Sprachkenntnissen auf dem Niveau B 1 des Gemeinsamen Europäischen Referenzrahmens für Sprachen genügt, um frühere Erklärungen zu einem nichtdeutschen Volkstum rückgängig zu machen.