Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
6 B 34/19, 6 B 34/19 (6 C 25/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:131119B6B34.19.0 Generato dall'IA

Klagebefugnis einer Landesmedienanstalt gegen bundesweit gültigen Zulassungsbescheid einer anderen Landesmedienanstalt

Numero d'incarto 6 B 34/19, 6 B 34/19 (6 C 25/19)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court permitted an appeal to the Federal Court of Justice, finding the complaint against the non-admission of the appeal well-founded. The dispute concerns whether a state media authority possesses standing to bring an action against a broadcast licensing decision issued by another state media authority that is valid nationwide. The court determined that the case meets the requirement of fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, necessitating clarification of the plaintiff's standing in such inter-state regulatory conflicts.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Klagebefugnis einer Landesmedienanstalt gegen bundesweit gültigen Zulassungsbescheid einer anderen Landesmedienanstalt: The dispute concerns whether a state media authority possesses standing to bring an action against a broadcast licensing decision issued by another state media authority that is valid nationwide. The court determined that the case meets the requirement of fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, necessitating clarification of the plaintiff's standing in such inter-state regulatory conflicts.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
legittimazione a ricorrere oggetto della lite autorità amministrativa e-justice diritto dei mezzi di comunicazione ricorso del personale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Basis for admitting the appeal as the matter has fundamental significance.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Used to determine the value in dispute for the appeal proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Used to determine the preliminary value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
6 B 1/12
Rundfunkgebührenpflicht: Personen- vs. Grundstücksbezug der Zweitgerätebefreiung und Unterscheidung zwischen Bürogemeinschaft und Berufsausübungsgemeinschaft
6 C 48/15
Wohnungsbezogener Rundfunkbeitrag als verfassungsmäßig zulässige nichtsteuerliche Abgabe
6 C 25/19
Lack of standing for regional media authorities to challenge nationwide broadcast licenses due to centralized decision-making by the Joint Committee on Admission and Supervision (ZAK)
6 AV 2/24
Broadcasting fee jurisdiction with multiple residences in different administrative court districts under § 52 Nr. 3 VwGO
6 B 18/17
Admission of revision for general legal significance: failure to substantiate concrete, unresolved conflict with prior case law on EU-law compatibility of private broadcasting contribution

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for admitting the appeal as the matter has fundamental significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Used to determine the value in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Used to determine the preliminary value in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Klagebefugnis der Landesmedienanstalt; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist zulässig und begründet. Die Rechtssache hat die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Sie gibt dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage, ob einer Landesmedienanstalt eine Klagebefugnis gegen einen bundesweit gültigen rundfunkrechtlichen Zulassungsbescheid einer anderen Landesmedienanstalt zusteht.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.