Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 593/17 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rk20200110.1bvr059317 Generato dall'IA

Unlawfulness of general binding force declaration for construction industry social fund collective agreement under freedom of association and assembly.

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 593/17
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court declined to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, thereby leaving the lower court's judgment in force and ruling against the complainants. The dispute concerned a challenge to a Federal Labor Court decision that declared the 2014 general declaration of binding force for the collective agreement on the social fund procedure in the construction industry ineffective. The complainants alleged violations of freedom of association and assembly, but the Court found the objections unfounded, citing its prior reasoning in a parallel case, and dismissed the appeal as inadmissible.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 9 Abs. 3 GG, Art. 2 Abs. 1 GG, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Unlawfulness of general binding force declaration for construction industry social fund collective agreement under freedom of association and assembly: The dispute concerned a challenge to a Federal Labor Court decision that declared the 2014 general declaration of binding force for the collective agreement on the social fund procedure in the construction industry ineffective. The complainants alleged violations of freedom of association and assembly, but the Court found the objections unfounded, citing its prior reasoning in a parallel case, and dismissed the appeal as inadmissible.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
libertà di riunione e di associazione contratto collettivo dichiarazione di validità accordo di associazione diritti sindacali delitto collettivo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 9 Abs. 3 GG
Die gerichtliche Entscheidung verstoße gegen Art. 9 Abs. 3 GG, jedenfalls aber gegen Art.
Art. 2 Abs. 1 GG
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Procedural provision cited in the operative text to justify the omission of a further detailed legal reasoning.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 4/17
Constitutional right to freedom of association does not confer a claim to declaration of a collective agreement as generally binding
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 1104/17
Constitutional complaint against invalidity of general declaratory extension of collective agreement on social fund in construction industry; violation of freedom of association and general personal rights.
1 BvR 1459/17
Invalidity of statutory extension of construction sector social fund collective agreement and alleged violation of collective bargaining freedom
10 ABR 12/18
Validity of general binding declaration for construction industry social fund collective agreement under § 5 Abs. 1a TVG
10 AZR 399/18
Constitutionality of statutory extension of collective bargaining agreements to secure construction industry social funds despite prior annulment of general binding force declaration
1 BvR 4/17
Constitutional right to freedom of association does not confer a claim to declaration of a collective agreement as generally binding

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Procedural provision cited in the operative text to justify the omission of a further detailed legal reasoning.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Parallelentscheidung

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

[GRUENDE]

I. Die Beschwerdeführenden wenden sich dagegen, dass das Bundesarbeitsgericht mit der angegriffenen Entscheidung die im Jahr 2014 erfolgte Allgemeinverbindlicherklärung des Tarifvertrags über das Sozialkassenverfahren im Baugewerbe (VTV) für unwirksam erklärt hat. Die gerichtliche Entscheidung verstoße gegen Art. 9 Abs. 3 GG, jedenfalls aber gegen Art. 9 Abs. 1 und Art. 2 Abs. 1 GG.

II. Die Verfassungsbeschwerde ist nicht zur Entscheidung anzunehmen, weil die mit ihr vorgebrachten Rügen unbegründet sind. Hinsichtlich der Einzelheiten wird auf die Ausführungen der Kammer im Verfahren 1 BvR 4/17 verwiesen, die auch im vorliegenden Fall einem Erfolg der Verfassungsbeschwerde entgegenstehen.

III. Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.