Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvF 1/05 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2011:fs20110503.2bvf000105 Generato dall'IA

Constitutionality of Air Security Act: Conflict over legislative competence under Article 35 GG and permissibility of military weapons against civilian aircraft

Numero d'incarto 2 BvF 1/05
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Second Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court issued a decision referring the case to the Full Court, as it intends to deviate from the legal opinions previously established by the First Senate regarding the constitutionality of the Air Security Act. The dispute concerns the 2005 amendments to the Act, specifically the provisions authorizing the military to shoot down civilian aircraft in imminent terrorist threats, challenging the legislative competence of the federal government and the compatibility of such measures with the constitution. The critical legal issue involves whether the authority to shoot down civilian aircraft can be grounded exclusively in Article 35(2) and (3) of the Basic Law (regarding defense against foreign armed attack) rather than Articles 73(1) or 73(6), whether this constitutional basis permits the use of specifically military weapons against civilians, and whether the emergency power granted to the Federal Minister of Defense violates the procedural safeguards of Article 35(3) Sentence 1.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 16 Absatz 1 BVerfGG, § 48 Absatz 1 Geschäftsordnung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts; Constitutionality of Air Security Act: Conflict over legislative competence under Article 35 GG and permissibility of military weapons against civilian aircraft: The dispute concerns the 2005 amendments to the Act, specifically the provisions authorizing the military to shoot down civilian aircraft in imminent terrorist threats, challenging the legislative competence of the federal government and the compatibility of such measures with the constitution. The critical legal issue involves whether the authority to shoot down civilian aircraft can be grounded exclusively in Article 35(2) and (3) of the Basic Law (regarding defense against foreign armed attack) rather than Articles 73(1) or 73(6), whether this constitutional basis permits the use of specifically military weapons against civilians, and whether the emergency power granted to the Federal Minister of Defense violates the procedural safeguards of Article 35(3) Sentence 1.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
costituzionalità legge sulle armi conflitto di poteri competenza legislativa conflitto armato diritto estero

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 16 Absatz 1 BVerfGG
Cited as the primary procedural basis for referring the matter to the Plenum due to a divergence in legal opinion between the Second and First Senates.
§ 48 Absatz 1 Geschäftsordnung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts
Cited as the procedural rule governing the internal procedure for the reference of the case to the Plenum.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 115, 118
Satz 2 und Absatz 3 des Grundgesetzes stützen lässt (BVerfGE 115, 118 ),
Generato dall'IA
2 PBvU 1/11
Legislative competence for air security military deployment and constitutional limits on use of specifically military weapons and emergency decision-making under Article 35 and 87a GG
III ZR 140/15
State liability for military airstrikes abroad: inapplicability of domestic liability law to foreign nationals and non-decision-relevance of hearing violations
6 C 46/16
Factual interference with assembly freedom via unannounced low-altitude military flyover over protest camp
3 C 4/16
Statutory basis for flight bans in foreign conflict zones: classification of missile threats as operationally related dangers under general aviation oversight law

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 16 Absatz 1 BVerfGG

Cited as the primary procedural basis for referring the matter to the Plenum due to a divergence in legal opinion between the Second and First Senates.

§ 48 Absatz 1 Geschäftsordnung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts

Cited as the procedural rule governing the internal procedure for the reference of the case to the Plenum.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Anrufung des Plenums wegen abweichender Rechtsauffassung der beiden Senate zur Verfassungsmäßigkeit von Regelungen des Luftsicherheitsgesetzes

[TENOR]

Das Plenum des Bundesverfassungsgerichts wird gemäß § 16 Absatz 1 des Gesetzes über das Bundesverfassungsgericht (Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz

- BVerfGG), § 48 Absatz 1 der Geschäftsordnung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts angerufen. Der Zweite Senat will von der Rechtsauffassung

des Ersten Senats abweichen, nach der

1. die Gesetzgebungszuständigkeit für die §§ 13 bis 15 (dort zu § 14 Absatz 3) des Luftsicherheitsgesetzes (LuftSiG) in der

Fassung des Artikels 1 des Gesetzes zur Neuregelung von Luftsicherheitsaufgaben vom 11. Januar 2005 (Bundesgesetzblatt I Seite

78) sich nicht auf Artikel 73 Nummer 1 oder Artikel 73 Nummer 6 des Grundgesetzes, sondern allein auf Artikel 35 Absatz 2

Satz 2 und Absatz 3 des Grundgesetzes stützen lässt (BVerfGE 115, 118 ),

2. Artikel 35 Absatz 2 Satz 2 und Absatz 3 des Grundgesetzes einen Einsatz der Streitkräfte mit spezifisch militärischen Waffen

nicht zulässt (BVerfGE 115, 118 ), und

3. § 13 Absatz 3 Satz 2 und 3 des Luftsicherheitsgesetzes mit Artikel 35 Absatz 3 Satz 1 des Grundgesetzes unvereinbar ist,

soweit er eine Eilkompetenz des Bundesministers der Verteidigung für die Fälle des Artikels 35 Absatz 3 des Grundgesetzes

vorsieht (BVerfGE 115, 118 ).