Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
2 BvR 1010/08 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2010:rs20101013.2bvr101008 Generato dall'IA

Valuation of subject matter value for attorney fees in constitutional complaint and provisional injunction proceedings; refusal of out-of-pocket expense reimbursement

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 1010/08
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court fixed the subject matter value for the attorney’s representation at €1,000,000 in the main proceedings and €100,000 in the preliminary injunction proceedings, while dismissing the applicant’s request for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses in the interim measure procedure. This decision addresses administrative determinations in a constitutional complaint and the associated preliminary injunction procedure, specifically concerning the valuation of legal services and the recovery of litigation costs. The ruling relies on §§ 37(2) sentence 2 and 22(1) of the Federal Lawyers’ Fee Act (RVG), which govern the calculation of subject matter values and the conditions for cost reimbursement in constitutional court proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 22 Abs. 1 RVG, § 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG; Valuation of subject matter value for attorney fees in constitutional complaint and provisional injunction proceedings; refusal of out-of-pocket expense reimbursement: This decision addresses administrative determinations in a constitutional complaint and the associated preliminary injunction procedure, specifically concerning the valuation of legal services and the recovery of litigation costs. The ruling relies on §§ 37(2) sentence 2 and 22(1) of the Federal Lawyers’ Fee Act (RVG), which govern the calculation of subject matter values and the conditions for cost reimbursement in constitutional court proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
liquidazione degli onorari difensivi tassa amministrativa procedura di stima rimborso delle spese rappresentanza legale recupero dei costi

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG

Provision cited to justify the determination of the subject matter value for the attorney's activities in the main and provisional proceedings.

§ 22 Abs. 1 RVG

Provision cited alongside § 37 to govern the calculation and fixing of the fee-relevant subject matter value.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren sowie im eA-Verfahren - Ablehnung der Auslagenerstattung im eA-Verfahren

[TENOR]

1. Der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit des Bevollmächtigten zu 1. im Hauptsacheverfahren wird auf 1.000.000

€ (in Worten: eine Million Euro) und im Verfahren auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung auf 100.000 € (in Worten: einhunderttausend

Euro) festgesetzt (§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2, § 22 Abs. 1 RVG).

2. Der Antrag auf Erstattung der Auslagen in dem Verfahren auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt.