Parish Appeal Against Church Tax Levy Struck Out After Withdrawal
Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe administrative court addressed an appeal filed by a Parish against a State Council decision that upheld an appeal against the Parish Council's resolution to levy a church tax for the year 1989. Following subsequent legislative changes, the appealing Parish communicated its withdrawal from the appeal, which the court treated as a submission to the opposing party's position for the purposes of costs; consequently, the court struck the appeal from the roll, dispensed with fees, and ordered the appellant to reimburse the respondent CHF 100 for costs.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 273 vLT, Art. 60 PAmm, Art. 61 PAmm, Art. 31 PAmm, Art. 28 PAmm, Art. 18 PAmm; Parish Appeal Against Church Tax Levy Struck Out After Withdrawal: Following subsequent legislative changes, the appealing Parish communicated its withdrawal from the appeal, which the court treated as a submission to the opposing party's position for the purposes of costs; consequently, the court struck the appeal from the roll, dispensed with fees, and ordered the appellant to reimburse the respondent CHF 100 for costs.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis provision was considered by the Tribunal in the context of the procedure leading to the final orders.
This provision was considered by the Tribunal in the context of the procedure leading to the final orders.
This provision was considered by the Tribunal in the context of the procedure leading to the final orders.
This provision was considered by the Tribunal in the context of the procedure leading to the final orders.
This provision was considered by the Tribunal in the context of the procedure leading to the final orders.
This provision was considered by the Tribunal in the context of the procedure leading to the final orders.
This provision was considered by the Tribunal in the context of the procedure leading to the final orders.
This provision was considered by the Tribunal in the context of the procedure leading to the final orders.
This provision was considered by the Tribunal in the context of the procedure leading to the final orders.
This provision was considered by the Tribunal in the context of the procedure leading to the final orders.
This provision, although not explicitly listed above, is usually implied for cost decisions in the absence of a specific cost article, but since no cost article is explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 2 and 3, and order 1 is a standard dismissal/striking out, and there are no other relevant cited articles in the dispositive, this standard procedural ground is not explicitly included.
This provision, although not explicitly listed above, is usually implied for cost decisions in the absence of a specific cost article, but since no cost article is explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 2 and 3, and order 1 is a standard dismissal/striking out, and there are no other relevant cited articles in the dispositive, this standard procedural ground is not explicitly included.
Testo completo
Incarto n. 52.95.00437 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi
segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli
statuendo sul ricorso 19 aprile 1991 della
Parrocchia di __________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro
la decisione 26 marzo 1991 (n. 2320) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata dall'avv. __________;
avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per l'anno 1989 di fr. 387.--;
vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;
preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;
assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;
visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA; 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,
dichiara e pronuncia:
1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.
2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.
3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 100.-- alla resistente a titolo di ripetibili.
4. Intimazione a: · __________
Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
Il presidente Il segretario