Parish Tax Appeal Withdrawal and Cost Allocation
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA parish administration filed an appeal against a State Council decision that upheld a challenge to the parish's resolution to levy a church tax for the year 1989. Following subsequent legislative changes, the appealing parish informed the court that it was withdrawing its appeal, leading the Administrative Cantonal Court to strike the case from the rolls. The court ruled that the withdrawal was equivalent to an adverse ruling for the purpose of determining costs, ordered no fees or expenses, and required the appellant to reimburse the appellee a specified sum for procedural costs.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 273 vLT, art. 61 PAmm, art. 31 PAmm, art. 28 PAmm, art. 18 PAmm, art. 8 PAmm; Parish Tax Appeal Withdrawal and Cost Allocation: Following subsequent legislative changes, the appealing parish informed the court that it was withdrawing its appeal, leading the Administrative Cantonal Court to strike the case from the rolls. The court ruled that the withdrawal was equivalent to an adverse ruling for the purpose of determining costs, ordered no fees or expenses, and required the appellant to reimburse the appellee a specified sum for procedural costs.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis article is cited in the dispositive section (implicitly through the overall context of the decision being pronounced based on cited articles) and relates to the outcome when a party withdraws its appeal, leading to the case being struck from the roll.
This article is cited in the dispositive section (implicitly through the overall context of the decision being pronounced based on cited articles) and governs the final administrative decision process, including costs/fees, although it does not strictly govern the cost rules applied in orders 2 and 3.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part, and in the context of administrative procedure.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part, and in the context of administrative procedure.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part, and in the context of administrative procedure.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part, and in the context of administrative procedure.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part, and in the context of administrative procedure.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part, and in the context of administrative procedure.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part, relating to the procedure.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part, relating to the procedure.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part, relating to the procedure.
This article is cited in the section listing applicable laws preceding the operative part.
Testo completo
Incarto n. 52.95.00436 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi
segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli
statuendo sul ricorso 19 aprile 1991 della
Parrocchia di __________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro
la decisione 26 marzo 1991 (n. 2336) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata da __________;
avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per l'anno 1989 di fr. 976.--;
vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;
preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;
assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;
visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA; 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,
dichiara e pronuncia:
1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.
2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.
3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 200.-- al resistente a titolo di ripetibili.
4. Intimazione a: · __________
Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
Il presidente Il segretario