Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
52.1995.435 • TCA TI 52.1995.435 Generato dall'IA

Parish Tax Levy Appeal Withdrawal and Costs Order

Numero d'incarto 52.1995.435
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali senza spese
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A religious parish filed an appeal against a state council decision that upheld an objection to the parish's resolution regarding the levy of a parish tax for the year 1990. Subsequent to the appeal, the parish formally withdrew its appeal due to intervening legislative changes, which the administrative court treated as a withdrawal equivalent to conceding the case on the matter of recoverable costs. Consequently, the court removed the appeal from the roll, waived fees and expenses, and ordered the appealing parish to reimburse the opposing party a specified amount for recoverable costs.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 273 vLT, art. 8 TOA, art. 12 TOA, art. 28 TOA, art. 3 PAmm, art. 18 PAmm; Parish Tax Levy Appeal Withdrawal and Costs Order: Subsequent to the appeal, the parish formally withdrew its appeal due to intervening legislative changes, which the administrative court treated as a withdrawal equivalent to conceding the case on the matter of recoverable costs. Consequently, the court removed the appeal from the roll, waived fees and expenses, and ordered the appealing parish to reimburse the opposing party a specified amount for recoverable costs.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedura fiscale dispositivo imposta ecclesiastica regolamento interno spese amministrative lite in materia di contribuzioni pubbliche Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 273 vLT
Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.
art. 8 TOA
Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.
art. 12 TOA
Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.
art. 28 TOA
Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.
art. 3 PAmm
Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.
art. 18 PAmm
Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.
art. 28 PAmm
Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.
art. 31 PAmm
Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.
Generato dall'IA
52.1995.427
Parish Tax Levy Appeal Withdrawal and Cost Order
52.1995.301
Parish Tax Levy Appeal Withdrawal and Costs Order
52.1995.436
Parish Tax Appeal Withdrawal and Cost Allocation
52.1995.178
Church Parish Appeal Withdrawal Over Parish Tax Levy
52.1995.181
Parish Tax Levy Appeal Withdrawal and Cost Award

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 273 vLT

Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.

art. 8 TOA

Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.

art. 12 TOA

Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.

art. 28 TOA

Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.

art. 3 PAmm

Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.

art. 18 PAmm

Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.

art. 28 PAmm

Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.

art. 31 PAmm

Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.

art. 60 PAmm

Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.

art. 61 PAmm

Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.

art. 3 PAmm

Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.

Art. 3 PAmm

Cited in the preamble, but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly rely on it to rule on the merits or procedure, only to list applicable law.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Incarto n. 52.95.00435 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi

segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della

Parrocchia di __________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro

la decisione 9 aprile 1991 (n. 2881) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata da __________;

avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per l'anno 1990 di fr. 664.--;

vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;

preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;

assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;

visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA; 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,

dichiara e pronuncia:

1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 200.-- al resistente a titolo di ripetibili.

4. Intimazione a: · __________

Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

Il presidente Il segretario