Parish Tax Dispute and Procedural Costs Reimbursement
Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA party appealed a state council decision which upheld an objection against a parish resolution imposing a church tax for the years 1989/90; subsequently, the parish, citing intervening legislative changes, withdrew its challenge to the administrative court, leading the court to strike the appeal from the record, forgo fees and costs, but order the original appellant to reimburse the opposing party for procedural costs, equating the withdrawal to a concession for the purpose of awarding costs.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 273 vLT, art. 28 TOA, art. 61 PAmm, art. 60 PAmm, art. 31 PAmm, art. 18 PAmm; Parish Tax Dispute and Procedural Costs Reimbursement: A party appealed a state council decision which upheld an objection against a parish resolution imposing a church tax for the years 1989/90; subsequently, the parish, citing intervening legislative changes, withdrew its challenge to the administrative court, leading the court to strike the appeal from the record, forgo fees and costs, but order the original appellant to reimburse the opposing party for procedural costs, equating the withdrawal to a concession for the purpose of awarding costs.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis procedural article is explicitly cited in the list of applicable norms preceding the dispositive, and the decision to strike the appeal from the roles is a procedural act.
This procedural article is explicitly cited in the list of applicable norms preceding the dispositive, governing the decision on costs or procedural outcomes.
This procedural article is explicitly cited in the list of applicable norms preceding the dispositive, likely relating to the removal of the case.
This procedural article is explicitly cited in the list of applicable norms preceding the dispositive, likely relating to the withdrawal/desistance.
This procedural article is explicitly cited in the list of applicable norms preceding the dispositive, likely governing the final judgment process.
This procedural article is explicitly cited in the list of applicable norms preceding the dispositive.
This procedural article is explicitly cited in the list of applicable norms preceding the dispositive.
This procedural article is explicitly cited in the list of applicable norms preceding the dispositive.
This provision is cited in the list of applicable norms preceding the dispositive, relevant to the handling of the case.
This provision is cited in the list of applicable norms preceding the dispositive, likely relating to the effect of the withdrawal on costs.
This procedural article is explicitly cited in the list of applicable norms preceding the dispositive, relating to the allocation of costs.
This procedural article is explicitly cited in the list of applicable norms preceding the dispositive, relating to procedural costs/fees.
This procedural article is explicitly cited in the list of applicable norms preceding the dispositive, relating to the decision on fees.
This provision is cited in the list of applicable norms preceding the dispositive and is referenced in order 2 regarding the waiving of taxes and expenses.
This provision is cited in the list of applicable norms preceding the dispositive and is referenced in order 3 regarding the allocation of costs (ripetibili).
Testo completo
Incarto n. 52.95.00298 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi
segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli
statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della
__________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro
la decisione 9 aprile 1991 (n. 2932) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata da __________;
avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per gli anni 1989/90 per complessivi fr. 64.--;
vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;
preso atto della replica e della duplica;
preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;
assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;
visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA; 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,
dichiara e pronuncia:
1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.
2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.
3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 100.-- al resistente a titolo di ripetibili.
4. Intimazione a: · __________
Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
Il presidente Il segretario