Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
52.1995.297 • TCA TI 52.1995.297 Generato dall'IA

Appellant v. Respondent: 1989 Parish Tax Challenge Withdrawal and Costs

Numero d'incarto 52.1995.297
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali senza spese

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant challenged a governmental decision that overturned a parish council's resolution imposing a parish tax for the year 1989. The court dismissed the appeal after the respondent parish, citing subsequent legislative changes, withdrew its challenge to the lower court's decision, treating this withdrawal as a concession regarding costs, resulting in the appeal being struck from the roll, with no fees or expenses levied, but requiring the original appellant to reimburse the respondent for costs.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 273 vLT, Art. 28 TOA, Art. 31 PAmm, Art. 61 PAmm, Art. 60 PAmm, Art. 18 PAmm; Appellant v. Respondent: 1989 Parish Tax Challenge Withdrawal and Costs: The court dismissed the appeal after the respondent parish, citing subsequent legislative changes, withdrew its challenge to the lower court's decision, treating this withdrawal as a concession regarding costs, resulting in the appeal being struck from the roll, with no fees or expenses levied, but requiring the original appellant to reimburse the respondent for costs.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedura fiscale spese legali rimborso delle spese lite in materia di contribuzioni pubbliche concessione imposta ecclesiastica Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 273 vLT
This article from the former law is cited as part of the legal basis governing the procedure.
Art. 28 TOA
This procedural article is implicitly cited as part of the legal basis governing the court's procedure, although the substantive reason for striking the case is the withdrawal by the appellant.
Art. 31 PAmm
This procedural article is cited in the preamble and governs the procedure for rendering decisions, specifically relating to the withdrawal/settlement leading to the case being struck.
Art. 61 PAmm
This article is cited as part of the legal basis governing the procedure, relevant to costs/reimbursement following the withdrawal.
Art. 60 PAmm
This article is cited as part of the legal basis governing the procedure, relevant to costs/reimbursement following the withdrawal.
Art. 18 PAmm
This procedural article is cited as part of the legal basis governing the procedure.
Art. 12 TOA
This procedural article is cited as part of the legal basis governing the procedure.
Art. 8 TOA
This procedural article is cited as part of the legal basis governing the procedure.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 28 TOA

This procedural article is implicitly cited as part of the legal basis governing the court's procedure, although the substantive reason for striking the case is the withdrawal by the appellant.

Art. 31 PAmm

This procedural article is cited in the preamble and governs the procedure for rendering decisions, specifically relating to the withdrawal/settlement leading to the case being struck.

Art. 61 PAmm

This article is cited as part of the legal basis governing the procedure, relevant to costs/reimbursement following the withdrawal.

Art. 60 PAmm

This article is cited as part of the legal basis governing the procedure, relevant to costs/reimbursement following the withdrawal.

Art. 18 PAmm

This procedural article is cited as part of the legal basis governing the procedure.

Art. 12 TOA

This procedural article is cited as part of the legal basis governing the procedure.

Art. 8 TOA

This procedural article is cited as part of the legal basis governing the procedure.

Art. 273 vLT

This article from the former law is cited as part of the legal basis governing the procedure.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Incarto n. 52.95.00297 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi

segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della

__________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro

la decisione 9 aprile 1991 (n. 2879) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata dalla __________;

avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per l'anno 1989 di fr. 72.--;

vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;

preso atto della replica e della duplica;

preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;

assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;

visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA; 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,

dichiara e pronuncia:

1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 100.-- alla resistente a titolo di ripetibili.

4. Intimazione a: · __________

Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

Il presidente Il segretario