Appeal Dismissed Following Legislative Change and Withdrawal
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA party appealed a state council decision that upheld a parish council resolution imposing a parish tax for the years 1989/90 amounting to a specific sum, but the appeal was subsequently removed from the docket after the opposing parish declared withdrawal from the proceedings due to intervening legislative changes, which the court treated as a concession for the purpose of awarding costs, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal, the waiver of court fees, and an order for the appellant to reimburse the respondent a set amount for legal costs.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 273 vLT, Art. 31 PAmm, Art. 60 PAmm, Art. 61 PAmm, Art. 8 TOA, Art. 12 TOA; Appeal Dismissed Following Legislative Change and Withdrawal: A party appealed a state council decision that upheld a parish council resolution imposing a parish tax for the years 1989/90 amounting to a specific sum, but the appeal was subsequently removed from the docket after the opposing parish declared withdrawal from the proceedings due to intervening legislative changes, which the court treated as a concession for the purpose of awarding costs, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal, the waiver of court fees, and an order for the appellant to reimburse the respondent a set amount for legal costs.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis procedural article is listed among those seen, and likely justifies the court's action regarding the withdrawal/rejection of the appeal, although the dispositive itself cites no specific ground for the final decision beyond striking it from the roll.
This article, related to costs or procedural steps, is explicitly mentioned in the context leading to the final orders.
This article, related to costs or procedural steps, is explicitly mentioned in the context leading to the final orders.
This article, related to costs or procedural steps, is explicitly mentioned in the context leading to the final orders.
This procedural article is listed among those seen and relates to the court's action in striking the case from the roll.
This procedural article is listed among those seen and relates to the court's action in striking the case from the roll.
This procedural article is listed among those seen and relates to the court's action in striking the case from the roll.
This procedural article is listed among those seen and relates to the court's action in striking the case from the roll.
This article is cited as relevant background for the procedural decision to strike the case from the roll.
This article is cited as relevant background for the procedural decision to strike the case from the roll.
Although not directly cited in the operative part, it is listed in the 'visti' section which precedes the orders, and given the withdrawal, it is the primary statutory basis for the procedural action.
Cited in the 'visti' section, it may govern the costs awarded in order 3.
Cited in the 'visti' section, it may govern the costs awarded in order 3.
Cited in the 'visti' section, it may govern the procedural steps.
Cited in the 'visti' section, it may govern the procedural steps.
Cited in the 'visti' section, it may govern the procedural steps.
Cited in the 'visti' section, it may govern the procedural steps.
Cited in the 'visti' section, it may govern the procedural steps.
Cited in the 'visti' section, it may govern the procedural steps.
Testo completo
Incarto n. 52.95.00295 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi
segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli
statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della
__________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro
la decisione 9 aprile 1991 (n. 2930) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata dalla __________;
avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per gli anni 1989/90 per complessivi fr. 10'558.--;
vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;
preso atto della replica e della duplica;
preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;
assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;
visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA; 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,
dichiara e pronuncia:
1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.
2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.
3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 300.-- alla resistente a titolo di ripetibili.
4. Intimazione a: · __________
Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
Il presidente Il segretario