Parish Tax Appeal Withdrawal and Costs Award
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAAn appeal was lodged against a State Council decision that upheld an objection to a parish council's resolution imposing a parish tax for the years 1989/90 totaling a specified amount. Subsequently, the appealing parish, citing intervening legislative changes, formally withdrew its appeal, which the administrative court treated as a concession of defeat for the purpose of awarding costs. Consequently, the court struck the appeal from the record, waived fees and expenses, but ordered the original appellant to reimburse the opposing party a set amount for legal costs.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 273 vLT, art. 8 TOA, art. 12 TOA, art. 28 TOA, art. 3 PAmm, art. 18 PAmm; Parish Tax Appeal Withdrawal and Costs Award: Subsequently, the appealing parish, citing intervening legislative changes, formally withdrew its appeal, which the administrative court treated as a concession of defeat for the purpose of awarding costs. Consequently, the court struck the appeal from the record, waived fees and expenses, but ordered the original appellant to reimburse the opposing party a set amount for legal costs.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis provision appears in the list of articles reviewed, and the court explicitly declared the appeal struck from the rolls, which relates to procedural disposition based on the withdrawal of the appeal.
This procedural provision is cited, likely governing the overall jurisdiction or procedure before the Administrative Tribunal, relevant to the handling of the case.
This procedural provision is cited, likely governing the overall jurisdiction or procedure before the Administrative Tribunal, relevant to the handling of the case.
This procedural provision is cited, likely governing the overall jurisdiction or procedure before the Administrative Tribunal, relevant to the handling of the case.
This procedural provision is cited, relevant to the handling of the case.
This procedural provision is cited, relevant to the handling of the case.
This procedural provision is cited, relevant to the handling of the case.
This procedural provision is cited, relevant to the handling of the case.
This procedural provision is cited, relevant to the handling of the case.
This procedural provision is cited, relevant to the handling of the case.
This provision is cited in relation to the order that the appellant must reimburse the respondent for costs/reimbursement of costs.
Testo completo
Incarto n. 52.95.00293 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi
segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli
statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della
__________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro
la decisione 9 aprile 1991 (n. 2910) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata dalla __________;
avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per gli anni 1989/90 per complessivi fr. 5'468.--;
vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;
preso atto della replica e della duplica;
preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;
assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;
visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA; 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,
dichiara e pronuncia:
1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.
2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.
3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 300.-- alla resistente a titolo di ripetibili.
4. Intimazione a: · __________
Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
Il presidente Il segretario