Parish Tax Appeal Withdrawal and Fee Order
Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe administrative court addressed an appeal against a decision that upheld a challenge to a parish council's resolution imposing a parish tax for the year 1989; following intervening legislative changes, the appealing parish formally withdrew its challenge, which the court treated as a withdrawal equivalent to conceding the case, leading to the appeal being removed from the rolls without court fees or costs, though the original appellant was ordered to reimburse the respondent for legal fees.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 273 vLT, Art. 28 TOA, Art. 61 PAmm, Art. 60 PAmm, Art. 31 PAmm, Art. 18 PAmm; Parish Tax Appeal Withdrawal and Fee Order: The administrative court addressed an appeal against a decision that upheld a challenge to a parish council's resolution imposing a parish tax for the year 1989; following intervening legislative changes, the appealing parish formally withdrew its challenge, which the court treated as a withdrawal equivalent to conceding the case, leading to the appeal being removed from the rolls without court fees or costs, though the original appellant was ordered to reimburse the respondent for legal fees.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis procedural article is cited in the preamble to the decision, which precedes the operative part, but its application is implicitly linked to the decision to strike the appeal from the roll (order 1) and the ruling on costs (order 2), suggesting a basis for managing the case before the final orders.
This procedural article is cited among the bases for the decision, relating to the management of the case leading to the dismissal of the appeal (order 1).
This procedural article is cited among the bases for the decision, relating to the management of the case leading to the dismissal of the appeal (order 1).
This procedural article is cited among the bases for the decision, relating to the final determination of the proceedings.
This procedural article is cited among the bases for the decision, relating to the final determination of the proceedings.
This procedural article is cited among the bases for the decision, relating to the final determination of the proceedings.
This procedural article is cited among the bases for the decision, relating to the final determination of the proceedings.
This procedural article is cited among the bases for the decision, relating to the final determination of the proceedings.
This procedural article is cited among the bases for the decision, relating to the final determination of the proceedings.
Although not explicitly cited in the final orders, based on the reference to Art. 61 PAmm and the nature of the judgment, rules regarding costs and fees are typically inferred from this section, but since order 2 explicitly waives fees and order 3 dictates reimbursement, specific articles from the PAmm related to these outcomes are prioritized. However, given the strict rule to only include explicitly cited articles in the dispositive, and none of the cited articles (3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm) directly mandate the specific outcome of orders 2 and 3, we rely only on the ones cited in the preamble that are relevant to the overall decision structure.
This article is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 1, 2, or 3.
This article is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 1, 2, or 3.
This article is not applicable as the decision is from a Cantonal Administrative Tribunal, not the Federal Supreme Court (LTF).
Testo completo
Incarto n. 52.95.00287 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi
segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli
statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della
__________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro
la decisione 9 aprile 1991 (n. 2839) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata dalla __________;
avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per l'anno 1989 di fr. 248.--;
vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;
preso atto della replica e della duplica;
preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;
assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;
visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA; 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,
dichiara e pronuncia:
1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.
2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.
3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 100.-- alla resistente a titolo di ripetibili.
4. Intimazione a: · __________
Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
Il presidente Il segretario