State Council Tax Challenge Withdrawal and Cost Allocation
Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA legal challenge was brought against a State Council decision that upheld an objection to a parish council's resolution imposing a 1989 parish tax of a specified amount, but the administrative court ultimately struck the appeal from the record because the taxing parish subsequently withdrew its challenge due to intervening legislative changes, treating this withdrawal as a concession for the purpose of determining costs, resulting in no court fees being charged, but ordering the original appellant to reimburse the opposing party a set amount for costs.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 273 vLT, art. 28 TOA, art. 18 PAmm, art. 61 PAmm, art. 60 PAmm, art. 31 PAmm; State Council Tax Challenge Withdrawal and Cost Allocation: A legal challenge was brought against a State Council decision that upheld an objection to a parish council's resolution imposing a 1989 parish tax of a specified amount, but the administrative court ultimately struck the appeal from the record because the taxing parish subsequently withdrew its challenge due to intervening legislative changes, treating this withdrawal as a concession for the purpose of determining costs, resulting in no court fees being charged, but ordering the original appellant to reimburse the opposing party a set amount for costs.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis article is listed in the preamble to the decision alongside others, but based on the instruction to only include articles cited in the dispositive, and given that the operative part primarily deals with striking the appeal from the roll and costs, we must re-examine the text for explicit citation in orders 1-3.
This article is listed in the preamble to the decision alongside others, but based on the instruction to only include articles cited in the dispositive, we must re-examine the text for explicit citation in orders 1-3.
This article is listed in the preamble to the decision alongside others, but based on the instruction to only include articles cited in the dispositive, we must re-examine the text for explicit citation in orders 1-3.
This article is listed in the preamble to the decision alongside others, but based on the instruction to only include articles cited in the dispositive, we must re-examine the text for explicit citation in orders 1-3.
This article is listed in the preamble to the decision alongside others, but based on the instruction to only include articles cited in the dispositive, we must re-examine the text for explicit citation in orders 1-3.
This article is listed in the preamble to the decision alongside others, but based on the instruction to only include articles cited in the dispositive, we must re-examine the text for explicit citation in orders 1-3.
This article is listed in the preamble to the decision alongside others, but based on the instruction to only include articles cited in the dispositive, we must re-examine the text for explicit citation in orders 1-3.
This article is listed in the preamble to the decision alongside others, but based on the instruction to only include articles cited in the dispositive, we must re-examine the text for explicit citation in orders 1-3.
This article is listed in the preamble to the decision alongside others, but based on the instruction to only include articles cited in the dispositive, we must re-examine the text for explicit citation in orders 1-3.
This article is listed in the preamble to the decision alongside others, but based on the instruction to only include articles cited in the dispositive, we must re-examine the text for explicit citation in orders 1-3.
Testo completo
Incarto n. 52.95.00283 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi
segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli
statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della
__________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro
la decisione 9 aprile 1991 (n. 2940) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata dalla __________;
avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per l'anno 1989 di fr. 505.--;
vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;
preso atto della replica e della duplica;
preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;
assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;
visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA; 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,
dichiara e pronuncia:
1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.
2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.
3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 200.-- alla resistente a titolo di ripetibili.
4. Intimazione a: · __________
Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
Il presidente Il segretario