Parish Tax Dispute Withdrawn on Appeal
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAAn appeal was lodged against a State Council decision that upheld a parochial council's resolution concerning the imposition of a parish tax for the year 1989, but the administrative court ultimately struck the appeal from the rolls because the appellant parish subsequently withdrew its objection, citing intervening legislative changes, and the court treated this withdrawal as a submission to the opponent for the purpose of determining costs, subsequently ordering the appellant to reimburse the opposing party for a specified amount in costs while waiving any court fees or expenses.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 273 vLT, Art. 28 TOA, Art. 31 PAmm, Art. 61 PAmm, Art. 8 TOA, Art. 12 TOA; Parish Tax Dispute Withdrawn on Appeal: An appeal was lodged against a State Council decision that upheld a parochial council's resolution concerning the imposition of a parish tax for the year 1989, but the administrative court ultimately struck the appeal from the rolls because the appellant parish subsequently withdrew its objection, citing intervening legislative changes, and the court treated this withdrawal as a submission to the opponent for the purpose of determining costs, subsequently ordering the appellant to reimburse the opposing party for a specified amount in costs while waiving any court fees or expenses.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IACited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Cited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Cited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Cited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Cited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Cited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Cited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Cited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Cited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Cited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Cited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Cited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Cited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Cited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Cited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Cited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Cited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Cited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Cited in the preamble to the decision, which implies its relevance for the procedural steps taken.
Testo completo
Incarto n. 52.95.00281 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi
segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli
statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della
__________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro
la decisione 9 aprile 1991 (n. 2873) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata dalla __________;
avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per l'anno 1989 di fr. 453.--;
vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;
preso atto della replica e della duplica;
preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;
assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;
visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA; 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,
dichiara e pronuncia:
1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.
2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.
3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 100.-- alla resistente a titolo di ripetibili.
4. Intimazione a: · __________
Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
Il presidente Il segretario