Parish Tax Appeal Withdrawn Due to Legislative Change
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA party appealed a decision by the State Council which had upheld another party's challenge against a parish resolution imposing a church tax for the year 1989. The court struck the appeal from the roll because the appealing parish subsequently withdrew its challenge due to intervening legislative changes, treating this withdrawal as a concession for the purpose of awarding costs, and consequently declared no fees or costs, but ordered the appellant to reimburse the respondent for procedural costs.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 273 vLT, 273 vLT, 61 PAmm, 60 PAmm, 31 PAmm, 28 PAmm; Parish Tax Appeal Withdrawn Due to Legislative Change: The court struck the appeal from the roll because the appealing parish subsequently withdrew its challenge due to intervening legislative changes, treating this withdrawal as a concession for the purpose of awarding costs, and consequently declared no fees or costs, but ordered the appellant to reimburse the respondent for procedural costs.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IACited in the preamble, this provision likely served as the basis for striking the appeal from the roll following the withdrawal of the challenge.
Cited in the preamble, this provision likely governed the determination of costs or indemnities in this administrative procedure.
Cited in the preamble, this provision likely governed the procedure for the removal of the case from the roll.
Cited in the preamble, this provision might relate to the procedure followed after the withdrawal of the appeal.
Cited in the preamble, this provision might relate to the administrative procedure concerning the case.
Cited in the preamble, this provision might relate to the general rules of administrative procedure.
Cited in the preamble, this provision might relate to the general rules of administrative procedure.
Cited in the preamble, this provision likely governed the court's decision on indemnities (ripetibili).
Cited in the preamble, this provision likely concerned the general jurisdiction or conduct of the court.
Cited in the preamble, this provision likely concerned the general jurisdiction or conduct of the court.
Order 2 states that no fees or costs are levied (no specific article cited in the dispositive for this point, but related to item 2).
Order 3 orders the appellant to reimburse the respondent for costs (ripetibili).
Testo completo
Incarto n. 52.95.00273 DP 178/91 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi
segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli
statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della
__________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro
la decisione 9 aprile 1991 (n. 2837) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata da __________;
avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per l'anno 1989 di fr. 54.--;
vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;
preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;
assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;
visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA; 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,
dichiara e pronuncia:
1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.
2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.
3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 100.-- al resistente a titolo di ripetibili.
4. Intimazione a: · __________
Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
Il presidente Il segretario