Parish Tax Appeal Withdrawal and Cost Assessment
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe administrative court considered an appeal against a governmental body's decision, which had upheld an ecclesiastical parish resolution concerning a CHF 155 church tax levy for the year 1989. The court struck the appeal from the record because the appellant parish subsequently declared it was withdrawing its appeal following intervening legislative changes, treating this withdrawal as a deemed loss for the purpose of assessing costs, resulting in the court ordering the appellant to reimburse the respondent CHF 100 for legal costs while waiving court fees and taxes.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 273 vLT, art. 8 TOA, art. 12 TOA, art. 28 TOA, art. 3 PAmm, art. 18 PAmm; Parish Tax Appeal Withdrawal and Cost Assessment: The court struck the appeal from the record because the appellant parish subsequently declared it was withdrawing its appeal following intervening legislative changes, treating this withdrawal as a deemed loss for the purpose of assessing costs, resulting in the court ordering the appellant to reimburse the respondent CHF 100 for legal costs while waiving court fees and taxes.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis provision, cited among others, is implicitly used as the procedural basis for the administrative court's decision regarding the appeal, following the withdrawal of the appeal.
This procedural rule is implicitly used to decide on the withdrawal of the appeal and its subsequent striking from the roll.
This procedural rule is implicitly used to decide on the withdrawal of the appeal and its subsequent striking from the roll.
This procedural rule is implicitly used to decide on the withdrawal of the appeal and its subsequent striking from the roll.
This procedural rule is implicitly used as a basis for the court's action.
This procedural rule is implicitly used as a basis for the court's action.
This procedural rule is implicitly used as a basis for the court's action.
This procedural rule is implicitly used as a basis for the court's action.
This procedural rule is implicitly used as a basis for the court's action.
This procedural rule is implicitly used as a basis for the court's action.
This procedural rule is used to decide on the allocation of costs (cost reimbursement).
Testo completo
Incarto n. 52.95.00270 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi
segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli
statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della
__________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro
la decisione 9 aprile 1991 (n. 2836) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata dalla __________;
avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per l'anno 1989 di fr. 155.--;
vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;
preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;
assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;
visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA; 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,
dichiara e pronuncia:
1. Il ricorso è stralciata dai ruoli.
2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.
3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 100.-- alla resistente a titolo di ripetibili.
4. Intimazione a: · __________
Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
Il presidente Il segretario