Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
52.1995.267 • TCA TI 52.1995.267 Generato dall'IA

Parish Tax Challenge and Withdrawal of Proceedings

Numero d'incarto 52.1995.267
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali senza spese
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A petitioner challenged a state council decision which upheld an appeal against a parish council resolution imposing a parish tax for the year 1989. Due to subsequent legislative changes, the taxing parish subsequently declared its withdrawal from the proceedings, which the court treated as a concession regarding costs. Consequently, the Administrative Cantonal Tribunal struck the appeal from the record, ordered no court fees, and required the original petitioner to reimburse the opposing party for costs.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 273 vLT, Art. 8 TOA, Art. 12 TOA, Art. 28 TOA, Art. 3 PAmm, Art. 18 PAmm; Parish Tax Challenge and Withdrawal of Proceedings: Due to subsequent legislative changes, the taxing parish subsequently declared its withdrawal from the proceedings, which the court treated as a concession regarding costs. Consequently, the Administrative Cantonal Tribunal struck the appeal from the record, ordered no court fees, and required the original petitioner to reimburse the opposing party for costs.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
impugnazione di decisioni amministrative dispositivo concessione spese di procedura allontanamento ritiro della domanda Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 273 vLT
Cited in the preamble, although the operative part does not directly rely on it for the substantive decision, it is contextually linked to the procedural basis for the outcome (withdrawal/removal from the roll).
Art. 8 TOA
Cited in the preamble, although the operative part does not directly rely on it for the substantive decision, it is contextually linked to the procedural basis for the outcome (withdrawal/removal from the roll).
Art. 12 TOA
Cited in the preamble, although the operative part does not directly rely on it for the substantive decision, it is contextually linked to the procedural basis for the outcome (withdrawal/removal from the roll).
Art. 28 TOA
Cited in the preamble, although the operative part does not directly rely on it for the substantive decision, it is contextually linked to the procedural basis for the outcome (withdrawal/removal from the roll).
Art. 3 PAmm
Cited in the preamble, although the operative part does not directly rely on it for the substantive decision, it is contextually linked to the procedural basis for the outcome (withdrawal/removal from the roll).
Art. 18 PAmm
Cited in the preamble, although the operative part does not directly rely on it for the substantive decision, it is contextually linked to the procedural basis for the outcome (withdrawal/removal from the roll).
Art. 28 PAmm
Cited in the preamble, although the operative part does not directly rely on it for the substantive decision, it is contextually linked to the procedural basis for the outcome (withdrawal/removal from the roll).
Art. 31 PAmm
Cited in the preamble, although the operative part does not directly rely on it for the substantive decision, it is contextually linked to the procedural basis for the outcome (withdrawal/removal from the roll).
Generato dall'IA
52.1995.206
Parish Tax Dispute Withdrawal and Cost Award
52.1995.247
Parish Council Tax Appeal Withdrawal and Costs
52.1995.264
Parish Tax Appeal Withdrawal and Procedural Costs Award
52.1995.184
Parish Tax Appeal Withdrawal
52.1995.293
Parish Tax Appeal Withdrawal and Costs Award

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 273 vLT

Cited in the preamble, although the operative part does not directly rely on it for the substantive decision, it is contextually linked to the procedural basis for the outcome (withdrawal/removal from the roll).

Art. 8 TOA

Cited in the preamble, although the operative part does not directly rely on it for the substantive decision, it is contextually linked to the procedural basis for the outcome (withdrawal/removal from the roll).

Art. 12 TOA

Cited in the preamble, although the operative part does not directly rely on it for the substantive decision, it is contextually linked to the procedural basis for the outcome (withdrawal/removal from the roll).

Art. 28 TOA

Cited in the preamble, although the operative part does not directly rely on it for the substantive decision, it is contextually linked to the procedural basis for the outcome (withdrawal/removal from the roll).

Art. 3 PAmm

Cited in the preamble, although the operative part does not directly rely on it for the substantive decision, it is contextually linked to the procedural basis for the outcome (withdrawal/removal from the roll).

Art. 18 PAmm

Cited in the preamble, although the operative part does not directly rely on it for the substantive decision, it is contextually linked to the procedural basis for the outcome (withdrawal/removal from the roll).

Art. 28 PAmm

Cited in the preamble, although the operative part does not directly rely on it for the substantive decision, it is contextually linked to the procedural basis for the outcome (withdrawal/removal from the roll).

Art. 31 PAmm

Cited in the preamble, although the operative part does not directly rely on it for the substantive decision, it is contextually linked to the procedural basis for the outcome (withdrawal/removal from the roll).

Art. 60 PAmm

Cited in the preamble, although the operative part does not directly rely on it for the substantive decision, it is contextually linked to the procedural basis for the outcome (withdrawal/removal from the roll).

Art. 61 PAmm

Cited in the preamble, although the operative part does not directly rely on it for the substantive decision, it is contextually linked to the procedural basis for the outcome (withdrawal/removal from the roll).

Art. 61 PAmm

Cited in the preamble, used to rule on the costs (refunding of 'ripetibili') following the withdrawal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Incarto n. 52.95.00267 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi

segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della

__________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro

la decisione 9 aprile 1991 (n. 2840) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata dalla __________;

avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per l'anno 1989 di fr. 118.--;

vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;

preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;

assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;

visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA; 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,

dichiara e pronuncia:

1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 100.-- alla resistente a titolo di ripetibili.

4. Intimazione a: · __________

Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

Il presidente Il segretario