Church Tax Appeal Withdrawal and Cost Award
Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA party appealed a governmental decision that upheld an ecclesiastical resolution imposing a church tax for the years 1989/90, but the appeal was subsequently withdrawn by the church authority due to intervening legislative changes. The administrative court struck the appeal from the record, waived fees and costs, and ordered the initial appellant to reimburse the opposing party for litigation costs, treating the withdrawal as a concession for the purpose of awarding costs.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 273 vLT, 28 TOA, 12 TOA, 8 TOA, 61 PAmm, 60 PAmm; Church Tax Appeal Withdrawal and Cost Award: The administrative court struck the appeal from the record, waived fees and costs, and ordered the initial appellant to reimburse the opposing party for litigation costs, treating the withdrawal as a concession for the purpose of awarding costs.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis procedural article is cited in the context of the decision on costs and compensation (implied by the surrounding cited procedural articles, even though the operative part only explicitly mentions cost articles).
This procedural article is cited in the context of the decision on costs and compensation (implied by the surrounding cited procedural articles, even though the operative part only explicitly mentions cost articles).
This procedural article is cited in the context of the decision on costs and compensation (implied by the surrounding cited procedural articles, even though the operative part only explicitly mentions cost articles).
This procedural article is cited in the context of the decision on costs and compensation (implied by the surrounding cited procedural articles, even though the operative part only explicitly mentions cost articles).
This procedural article is cited in the context of the decision on costs and compensation (implied by the surrounding cited procedural articles, even though the operative part only explicitly mentions cost articles).
This procedural article is cited in the context of the decision on costs and compensation (implied by the surrounding cited procedural articles, even though the operative part only explicitly mentions cost articles).
This procedural article is cited in the context of the decision on costs and compensation (implied by the surrounding cited procedural articles, even though the operative part only explicitly mentions cost articles).
This procedural article is cited in the context of the decision on costs and compensation (implied by the surrounding cited procedural articles, even though the operative part only explicitly mentions cost articles).
This procedural article is cited in the context of the decision on costs and compensation (implied by the surrounding cited procedural articles, even though the operative part only explicitly mentions cost articles).
This transitional provision is cited, likely governing the procedure for handling the withdrawal of the appeal.
Although not explicitly cited in the dispositive, the costs decision (order 2 and 3) relating to fees and compensation implicitly relies on the relevant procedural law concerning costs, which often follows similar structures to Art. 66 LTF in Swiss administrative law, but since no explicit cost article from LTF or equivalent is cited in the dispositive, this is based on interpreting the scope of the inquiry.
Although not explicitly cited in the dispositive, the costs decision (order 2 and 3) relating to fees and compensation implicitly relies on the relevant procedural law concerning costs, which often follows similar structures to Art. 64 LTF in Swiss administrative law, but since no explicit cost article from LTF or equivalent is cited in the dispositive, this is based on interpreting the scope of the inquiry.
Testo completo
Incarto n. 52.95.00263 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi
segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli
statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della
__________ contro
la decisione 9 aprile 1991 (n. 2892) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata da __________;
avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per gli anni 1989/90 per complessivi fr. 31.--;
vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;
preso atto della replica e della duplica;
preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;
assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;
visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA; 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,
dichiara e pronuncia:
1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.
2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.
3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 100.-- alla resistente a titolo di ripetibili.
4. Intimazione a: · __________
Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
Il presidente Il segretario