Parish Council Church Tax Dispute and Cost Reimbursement
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe administrative court addressed a petition challenging a state council decision that upheld an appeal against a parish council resolution imposing a church tax for a specific year. Following subsequent legislative changes, the parish formally withdrew its appeal, which the court treated as a submission to defeat for the purpose of determining costs. Consequently, the court struck the petition from the roles, waived fees, but ordered the original petitioner to reimburse the opposing party a specified amount for legal costs.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 273 vLT, art. 8 TOA, art. 12 TOA, art. 28 TOA, art. 3 PAmm, art. 18 PAmm; Parish Council Church Tax Dispute and Cost Reimbursement: Following subsequent legislative changes, the parish formally withdrew its appeal, which the court treated as a submission to defeat for the purpose of determining costs. Consequently, the court struck the petition from the roles, waived fees, but ordered the original petitioner to reimburse the opposing party a specified amount for legal costs.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis article is cited in the introduction and likely justifies the court's power to rule on the case, although the operative part does not explicitly invoke it for the outcome.
This article is cited in the introduction and likely relates to the court's jurisdiction or procedure, although the operative part does not explicitly invoke it for the outcome.
This article is cited in the introduction and likely relates to the court's jurisdiction or procedure, although the operative part does not explicitly invoke it for the outcome.
This article is cited in the introduction and likely relates to the court's jurisdiction or procedure, although the operative part does not explicitly invoke it for the outcome.
This article is cited in the introduction and likely relates to administrative procedure, although the operative part does not explicitly invoke it for the outcome.
This article is cited in the introduction and likely relates to administrative procedure, although the operative part does not explicitly invoke it for the outcome.
This article is cited in the introduction and likely relates to administrative procedure, although the operative part does not explicitly invoke it for the outcome.
This article is cited in the introduction and likely relates to administrative procedure, although the operative part does not explicitly invoke it for the outcome.
This article is cited in the introduction and likely relates to administrative procedure, although the operative part does not explicitly invoke it for the outcome.
This article is cited in the introduction and likely relates to administrative procedure, although the operative part does not explicitly invoke it for the outcome.
This article is cited in the introduction, and the court orders costs to be awarded, suggesting this provision (or related ones) covers the awarding of costs/reimbursement.
Testo completo
Incarto n. 52.95.00254 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi
segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli
statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della
__________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro
la decisione 9 aprile 1991 (n. 2896) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata dalla __________;
avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per l'anno 1989 di fr. 504.--;
vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;
preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;
assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;
visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA; 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,
dichiara e pronuncia:
1. Il ricorso è stralciata dai ruoli.
2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.
3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 200.-- alla resistente a titolo di ripetibili.
4. Intimazione a: · __________
Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
Il presidente Il segretario