Parish Council Church Tax Levy Appeal Withdrawal
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAAn appeal was filed challenging administrative decisions that upheld a parish council's resolution concerning a church tax levy for the years 1989/90, but the administrative court ultimately removed the appeal from the roll because the parish, citing subsequent legislative changes, withdrew its own prior appeals that had been granted by the State Council; consequently, the court declared the appeals defunct, waived official fees, and ordered the appellant to reimburse the respondent a specified amount for legal costs, treating the withdrawal as a concession for the purpose of determining reimbursement.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 273 vLT, 273 vLT, 28 TOA, 61 PAmm, 12 TOA, 31 PAmm; Parish Council Church Tax Levy Appeal Withdrawal: An appeal was filed challenging administrative decisions that upheld a parish council's resolution concerning a church tax levy for the years 1989/90, but the administrative court ultimately removed the appeal from the roll because the parish, citing subsequent legislative changes, withdrew its own prior appeals that had been granted by the State Council; consequently, the court declared the appeals defunct, waived official fees, and ordered the appellant to reimburse the respondent a specified amount for legal costs, treating the withdrawal as a concession for the purpose of determining reimbursement.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IACited in the list of applicable articles, although the specific application in the orders relates to procedural termination and costs.
Cited in the list of applicable articles, although the specific application in the orders relates to procedural termination and costs.
Cited in the list of applicable articles, likely forming the basis for the decision to strike the appeals from the roll due to withdrawal/lack of continuation.
Cited in the list of applicable articles, although the specific application in the orders relates to procedural termination and costs.
Cited in the list of applicable articles, likely forming the basis for the decision to strike the appeals from the roll due to withdrawal/lack of continuation.
Cited in the list of applicable articles, likely forming the basis for the decision to strike the appeals from the roll due to withdrawal/lack of continuation.
Cited in the list of applicable articles, although the specific application in the orders relates to procedural termination and costs.
Cited in the list of applicable articles, although the specific application in the orders relates to procedural termination and costs.
Cited in the list of applicable articles, although the specific application in the orders relates to procedural termination and costs.
Cited in the list of applicable articles, although the specific application in the orders relates to procedural termination and costs.
Although listed among the cited articles, this provision is most likely the underlying justification for order 1 (striking the appeals from the roll) given the withdrawal.
Although listed among the cited articles, this provision is most likely the underlying justification for order 1 (striking the appeals from the roll) given the withdrawal.
Although listed among the cited articles, this provision is most likely the underlying justification for order 1 (striking the appeals from the roll) given the withdrawal.
Although listed among the cited articles, this provision is most likely the underlying justification for order 1 (striking the appeals from the roll) given the withdrawal.
Although listed among the cited articles, this provision is most likely the underlying justification for order 1 (striking the appeals from the roll) given the withdrawal.
Although listed among the cited articles, this provision is most likely the underlying justification for order 1 (striking the appeals from the roll) given the withdrawal.
Although listed among the cited articles, this provision is most likely the underlying justification for order 1 (striking the appeals from the roll) given the withdrawal.
Although listed among the cited articles, this provision is most likely the underlying justification for order 1 (striking the appeals from the roll) given the withdrawal.
Although listed among the cited articles, this provision is most likely the underlying justification for order 1 (striking the appeals from the roll) given the withdrawal.
Although listed among the cited articles, this provision is most likely the underlying justification for order 1 (striking the appeals from the roll) given the withdrawal.
Testo completo
Incarto n. 52.95.00252-253 cm · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi
segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli
statuendo sui ricorsi 3 maggio 1991 della
__________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro
le decisioni 9 aprile 1991, no. 2895 e no. 2951, del Consiglio di Stato che accolgono le impugnative presentate da __________;
avverso le risoluzioni del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per gli anni 1989/90 per complessivi fr. 1'269.--;
vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;
preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;
assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;
visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA, 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,
dichiara e pronuncia:
1. I ricorsi sono stralciati dai ruoli.
2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.
3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 300.-- alla resistente a titolo di ripetibili.
4. Intimazione a: · ___________
Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
Il presidente Il segretario