Parish Tax Assessment Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal Following Legislative Change
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe administrative court addressed an appeal concerning a parish tax assessment of a specific amount for the year 1989, which was initially upheld by the State Council following an objection. The appellant sought the annulment of the State Council's decision which had reversed the parish resolution imposing the tax. However, the parish subsequently withdrew its appeal due to intervening legislative changes, which the court treated as a withdrawal of the appeal, leading to the appeal being struck from the record, no fees or expenses being charged, and the original appellant being ordered to reimburse the respondent for legal costs.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 273 vLT, art. 28 TOA, art. 61 PAmm, art. 60 PAmm, art. 31 PAmm, art. 18 PAmm; Parish Tax Assessment Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal Following Legislative Change: The appellant sought the annulment of the State Council's decision which had reversed the parish resolution imposing the tax. However, the parish subsequently withdrew its appeal due to intervening legislative changes, which the court treated as a withdrawal of the appeal, leading to the appeal being struck from the record, no fees or expenses being charged, and the original appellant being ordered to reimburse the respondent for legal costs.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis article is cited in the list of applicable provisions and is implicitly related to the withdrawal/striking of the appeal in order 1.
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions and relates to the decision on costs/reimbursement.
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions and is related to the procedure governing the court's action, specifically the striking of the case from the roll (order 1).
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions and is related to the procedure, relevant for the withdrawal/desistance.
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, likely governing the handling of the case after the desistment.
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, likely relevant to the assessment of costs/reimbursement (order 3).
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, likely governing the overall handling or finality of the decision.
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, likely governing jurisdiction or the general handling of the case.
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, likely relating to the capacity to appeal or general procedural principles.
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, likely related to the decision on costs (order 3).
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, likely relating to the decision on costs (order 3).
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, likely relating to the decision on costs (order 3).
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, likely relating to the decision on costs (order 3).
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, likely relating to the decision on costs (order 3).
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, related to the power to decide on the matter.
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, related to the power to decide on the matter.
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, related to the power to decide on the matter.
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, related to the power to decide on the matter.
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, related to the power to decide on the matter.
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, related to the power to decide on the matter.
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, related to the power to decide on the matter.
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, related to the power to decide on the matter.
This procedural article is cited in the list of applicable provisions, related to the power to decide on the matter.
Testo completo
Incarto n. 52.95.00240 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi
segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli
statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della
__________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro
la decisione 9 aprile 1991 (n. 2864) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata da __________;
avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per l'anno 1989 di fr. 15.--;
vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;
preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;
assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;
visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA; 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,
dichiara e pronuncia:
1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.
2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.
3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 100.-- alla resistente a titolo di ripetibili.
4. Intimazione a: · __________
Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
Il presidente Il segretario