Parish Tax Levy Appeal Withdrawal and Costs Award
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA legal challenge was brought against a state council decision that upheld an appeal concerning the levy of a small parish tax for a specific year. The administrative court declared the appeal withdrawn after the taxing parish indicated its intent to withdraw its initial challenge due to subsequent legislative changes, treating this withdrawal as a concession for the purposes of awarding costs; consequently, the court struck the appeal from the docket, waived official fees, and ordered the original appellant to reimburse the respondent a specified amount for costs.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 273 vLT, art. 61 PAmm, art. 60 PAmm, art. 31 PAmm, art. 28 PAmm, art. 18 PAmm; Parish Tax Levy Appeal Withdrawal and Costs Award: The administrative court declared the appeal withdrawn after the taxing parish indicated its intent to withdraw its initial challenge due to subsequent legislative changes, treating this withdrawal as a concession for the purposes of awarding costs; consequently, the court struck the appeal from the docket, waived official fees, and ordered the original appellant to reimburse the respondent a specified amount for costs.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis article, cited in the decision's reasoning block regarding the assimilation of withdrawal to losing the case for cost purposes, is implicitly the basis for the judgment on costs and indemnities.
This procedural rule is part of the basis for deciding the case, which is struck from the rolls due to the withdrawal of the appeal.
This procedural rule is part of the basis for deciding the case, which is struck from the rolls due to the withdrawal of the appeal.
This procedural rule is part of the basis for deciding the case, which is struck from the rolls due to the withdrawal of the appeal.
This procedural rule is part of the basis for deciding the case, which is struck from the rolls due to the withdrawal of the appeal.
This procedural rule is part of the basis for deciding the case, which is struck from the rolls due to the withdrawal of the appeal.
This procedural rule is part of the basis for deciding the case, which is struck from the rolls due to the withdrawal of the appeal.
This procedural rule is part of the basis for deciding the case, which is struck from the rolls due to the withdrawal of the appeal.
This procedural rule is part of the basis for deciding the case, which is struck from the rolls due to the withdrawal of the appeal.
This procedural rule is part of the basis for deciding the case, which is struck from the rolls due to the withdrawal of the appeal.
This procedural rule is cited in the list of applicable laws and is relevant to the court's jurisdiction or procedure.
Testo completo
Incarto n. 52.95.00196 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi
segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli
statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della
__________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro
la decisione 9 aprile 1991, no. 2927, del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata dalla __________;
avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per l'anno 1989 di fr. 6.--;
vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;
preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dall'impugnativa;
assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;
visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA, 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,
dichiara e pronuncia:
1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.
2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.
3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 100.-- alla resistente a titolo di ripetibili.
4. Intimazione a: · __________
Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
Il presidente Il segretario