Parish Tax Appeal Withdrawal and Costs Award
Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA parish filed an appeal against a State Council decision that upheld a challenge to the parish council's resolution imposing a church tax for the years 1989/1990; however, the administrative court struck the appeal from the roll because the appellant subsequently withdrew the appeal due to legislative changes, treating the withdrawal as a loss for the purpose of awarding CHF 200 in costs to the opposing party, while ordering no taxes or fees be levied.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 273 vLT, Art. 28 TOA, Art. 61 PAmm, Art. 60 PAmm, Art. 31 PAmm, Art. 28 PAmm; Parish Tax Appeal Withdrawal and Costs Award: A parish filed an appeal against a State Council decision that upheld a challenge to the parish council's resolution imposing a church tax for the years 1989/1990; however, the administrative court struck the appeal from the roll because the appellant subsequently withdrew the appeal due to legislative changes, treating the withdrawal as a loss for the purpose of awarding CHF 200 in costs to the opposing party, while ordering no taxes or fees be levied.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis provision is cited in the preamble among the rules considered, and the court order implicitly relies on procedural rules to dispose of the case following the withdrawal of the appeal.
This provision is cited in the preamble among the rules considered, and the court order implicitly relies on procedural rules to dispose of the case following the withdrawal of the appeal.
This provision is cited in the preamble among the rules considered, and the court order implicitly relies on procedural rules to dispose of the case following the withdrawal of the appeal.
This provision is cited in the preamble among the rules considered, and the court order implicitly relies on procedural rules to dispose of the case following the withdrawal of the appeal.
This provision is cited in the preamble among the rules considered, and the court order implicitly relies on procedural rules to dispose of the case following the withdrawal of the appeal.
This provision is cited in the preamble among the rules considered, and the court order implicitly relies on procedural rules to dispose of the case following the withdrawal of the appeal.
This provision is cited in the preamble among the rules considered, and the court order implicitly relies on procedural rules to dispose of the case following the withdrawal of the appeal.
This provision is cited in the preamble among the rules considered, and the court order implicitly relies on procedural rules to dispose of the case following the withdrawal of the appeal.
This provision is cited in the preamble among the rules considered, and the court order implicitly relies on procedural rules to dispose of the case following the withdrawal of the appeal.
This provision is cited in the preamble among the rules considered, and the court order implicitly relies on procedural rules to dispose of the case following the withdrawal of the appeal.
This provision is cited in the preamble among the rules considered, and the court order implicitly relies on procedural rules to dispose of the case following the withdrawal of the appeal.
This provision is cited in the preamble among the rules considered, and the court order implicitly relies on procedural rules to dispose of the case following the withdrawal of the appeal.
Testo completo
Incarto n. 52.95.00179 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi
segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli
statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della
Parrocchia di __________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro
la decisione 9 aprile 1991, no. 2894, del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata da __________;
avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per gli anni 1989/90 per complessivi fr. 975.--;
vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;
preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dall'impugnativa;
assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;
visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA, 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,
dichiara e pronuncia:
1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.
2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.
3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 200.-- alla resistente a titolo di ripetibili.
4. Intimazione a: · __________
Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo
Il presidente Il segretario