Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
52.1995.178 • TCA TI 52.1995.178 Generato dall'IA

Church Parish Appeal Withdrawal Over Parish Tax Levy

Numero d'incarto 52.1995.178
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali senza spese

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A church parish filed an appeal against a state council decision that upheld the annulment of the parish council's resolution to levy a parish tax for the year 1990. The administrative court struck the appeal from the docket because the appealing parish subsequently communicated its withdrawal of the appeal, referencing intervening legislative changes, and consequently, no court fees or costs were assessed.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

art. 60 PAmm, art. 61 PAmm, art. 3 PAmm, art. 18 PAmm, art. 28 PAmm, art. 31 PAmm; Church Parish Appeal Withdrawal Over Parish Tax Levy: The administrative court struck the appeal from the docket because the appealing parish subsequently communicated its withdrawal of the appeal, referencing intervening legislative changes, and consequently, no court fees or costs were assessed.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
imposta ecclesiastica decisioni incidentali disposizioni fiscali lite in materia di contribuzioni pubbliche tasse amministrative ritiro della domanda Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
art. 60 PAmm
This article is cited among the procedural provisions considered, but since the appeal was withdrawn, the final order cites no substantive ground for the decision itself.
art. 61 PAmm
This article is cited among the procedural provisions considered, but since the appeal was withdrawn, the final order cites no substantive ground for the decision itself.
art. 3 PAmm
This article is cited among the procedural provisions considered, but since the appeal was withdrawn, the final order cites no substantive ground for the decision itself.
art. 18 PAmm
This article is cited among the procedural provisions considered, but since the appeal was withdrawn, the final order cites no substantive ground for the decision itself.
art. 28 PAmm
This article is cited among the procedural provisions considered, but since the appeal was withdrawn, the final order cites no substantive ground for the decision itself.
art. 31 PAmm
This article is cited among the procedural provisions considered, but since the appeal was withdrawn, the final order cites no substantive ground for the decision itself.
art. 2 PAmm
Although not explicitly listed in the 'visti gli art.', the court's decision to not levy costs/fees is based on procedural rules implicitly governing such cases (like those concerning withdrawal of the appeal).
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 60 PAmm

This article is cited among the procedural provisions considered, but since the appeal was withdrawn, the final order cites no substantive ground for the decision itself.

art. 61 PAmm

This article is cited among the procedural provisions considered, but since the appeal was withdrawn, the final order cites no substantive ground for the decision itself.

art. 3 PAmm

This article is cited among the procedural provisions considered, but since the appeal was withdrawn, the final order cites no substantive ground for the decision itself.

art. 18 PAmm

This article is cited among the procedural provisions considered, but since the appeal was withdrawn, the final order cites no substantive ground for the decision itself.

art. 28 PAmm

This article is cited among the procedural provisions considered, but since the appeal was withdrawn, the final order cites no substantive ground for the decision itself.

art. 31 PAmm

This article is cited among the procedural provisions considered, but since the appeal was withdrawn, the final order cites no substantive ground for the decision itself.

art. 2 PAmm

Although not explicitly listed in the 'visti gli art.', the court's decision to not levy costs/fees is based on procedural rules implicitly governing such cases (like those concerning withdrawal of the appeal).

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Incarto n. 52.95.00178 leo · Lugano 15 febbraio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

composto dei giudici: · Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi

segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della

Parrocchia di __________ rappr. da: avv. __________ contro

la decisione 9 aprile 1991 (n. 2882) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata dalla __________;

avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per l'anno 1990;

vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;

preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;

visti gli art. 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm, dichiara e pronuncia:

1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

3. Intimazione a: · __________

Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

Il presidente Il segretario