Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
30 09 18 • KG LU 30 09 18 Generato dall'IA

Guardianship Authority Obligation in Contested Assistant Appointment

Numero d'incarto 30 09 18
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In a dispute between unmarried parents regarding the appointment of a guardian or assistant for their child following the establishment of an upbringing assistance measure, the higher court overturned the decision of the higher administrative authority that had substituted the initial appointment. The court reasoned that when the parents propose different candidates for the assistant role, the guardianship authority is legally obligated, according to relevant civil code articles, to appoint an independent and neutral person, as the role requires a neutral third party to mediate visitation issues, and it is not proper for a supervisory authority to make the new appointment directly upon finding error, but rather to refer the matter back to the initial authority for a fresh selection.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 379 Abs. 1, 381 und 397 ZGB. Weichen die Vorschläge der Eltern in Bezug auf die Wahl des Vormunds bzw. Beistands voneinander ab, hat die Vormundschaftsbehörde eine unabhängige, neutrale Person zu ernennen. | Familienrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
nomina del curatore autorità amministrativa oggetto della lite celibe responsabilità parentale obbligazione accessoria

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 379 Abs. 1 ZGB
Cited in the decision's operative part concerning the authority's duty to choose a suitable guardian/assistant.
Art. 397 ZGB
Cited in the decision's operative part as a cross-reference related to the appointment process.
Art. 308 ZGB
Art. 379 ZGB
Leitsatz: · Art. 379 Abs.
Art. 381 ZGB
Cited in the decision's operative part regarding respecting parental suggestions for the appointment.
Art. 308 Abs. 2 ZGB
Art. 388 ZGB
Art. 6 EMRK

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BGE 107 II 504
Mother's Appeal Against Guardian Appointment Dismissed Due to Lack of Standing
Generato dall'IA
30 00 13
Guardianship Appointment Without Considering Affected Parties' Wishes
30 99 2
Guardianship Appointment Challenge Jurisdiction
RRE Nr 381
Appointment of Guardian Due to Conflict of Interest in Estate Inheritance
3H 17 36
Child Protection Guardian Appointment vs. Party Nomination Preferences

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 379 Abs. 1 ZGB

Cited in the decision's operative part concerning the authority's duty to choose a suitable guardian/assistant.

Art. 381 ZGB

Cited in the decision's operative part regarding respecting parental suggestions for the appointment.

Art. 397 ZGB

Cited in the decision's operative part as a cross-reference related to the appointment process.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 03.12.2009

Fallnummer: · 30 09 18

LGVE: · 2010 I Nr. 5

Leitsatz: · Art. 379 Abs. 1, 381 und 397 ZGB. Weichen die Vorschläge der Eltern in Bezug auf die Wahl des Vormunds bzw. Beistands voneinander ab, hat die Vormundschaftsbehörde eine unabhängige, neutrale Person zu ernennen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.