Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
22 04 137 • KG LU 22 04 137 Generato dall'IA

Hague Abduction Convention Time Limit Application

Numero d'incarto 22 04 137
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The petitioner sought the return of children who had been brought to Switzerland by the respondent in late 2002, with the petitioner filing a return application in April 2004, which was dismissed as untimely by the lower court based on the one-year deadline under Article 12(1) of the Hague Abduction Convention. The appellate court upheld the dismissal, reasoning that the one-year deadline began to run from the date the petitioner clearly communicated his objection to the children remaining in Switzerland, evidenced by a January 2003 communication stating he was unhappy with the situation and requested confirmed return bookings by early March, and that subsequent negotiations for a friendly settlement did not pause or postpone the commencement of this statutory period, which was fixed to January 30, 2003.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEntf, Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEnft, Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEntfÜ; Hague Abduction Convention Time Limit Application: The appellate court upheld the dismissal, reasoning that the one-year deadline began to run from the date the petitioner clearly communicated his objection to the children remaining in Switzerland, evidenced by a January 2003 communication stating he was unhappy with the situation and requested confirmed return bookings by early March, and that subsequent negotiations for a friendly settlement did not pause or postpone the commencement of this statutory period, which was fixed to January 30, 2003.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ritorno secondo la Convenzione dell'Aia trattative transattive termine legale rapimento di minori momento del deposito termini di ricorso Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEntfÜ. Beginn der Jahresfrist. | Familienrecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEntf
2 Leitsatz: · Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEntfÜ.
Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEnft
2 Leitsatz: · Art. 12 Abs.
Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEntfÜ
This article concerning the one-year time limit was central to the court's determination of the admissibility (timeliness) of the return request.
Generato dall'IA
22 02 4
Hague Abduction Convention Return Order Upheld Despite Appeal for Child Representative
V 98 127
Foreign National Child Family Reunification Age Assessment Timing
22 04 116
Hague Convention Return Denial Upheld Based on Children's Will
22 01 68
Hague Abduction Convention Enforcement Overrides Appeal in Cross-Border Child Removal Case
22 03 4
Child Abduction Appeal: Return to Italy Upheld; No Oral Hearing Required; Autonomous Interpretation of Habitual Residence Confirmed

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEntfÜ

This article concerning the one-year time limit was central to the court's determination of the admissibility (timeliness) of the return request.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · II. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht Entscheiddatum: · 17.12.2004 Fallnummer: · 22 04 137 LGVE: · 2004 I Nr. 2 Leitsatz: · Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEntfÜ. Beginn der Jahresfrist. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.